California Assembly supports AB 60 for safer cosmetics and personal products

July 02, 2025 | California State Senate, Senate, Legislative, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

California Assembly supports AB 60 for safer cosmetics and personal products
The Senate Environmental Quality Committee convened on July 2, 2025, to discuss critical legislative measures aimed at enhancing public health and safety regarding toxic substances in consumer products. The primary focus of the meeting was Assembly Bill 60 (AB 60), which seeks to remove harmful toxins from cosmetics and personal care items.

The session began with a strong endorsement from a speaker who emphasized the urgency of the bill, stating, "We are not overreaching, we are catching up," and highlighting the need to protect future generations, particularly girls and women, from toxic exposure. The speaker urged committee members to vote in favor of AB 60.

Support for the bill was echoed by several representatives from various organizations and municipalities. Kira Ross spoke on behalf of the city of Glendale, while Chloe King represented the California Water Association. Claire Sullivan provided support on behalf of the cities of San Mateo, Santa Rosa, and Redwood City. Additionally, Keely Morris voiced support for the bill on behalf of the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts.

The committee then opened the floor for opposition, but no witnesses came forward to express dissent regarding the bill. Following this, committee members were invited to ask questions or make comments. The Vice Chair expressed gratitude to the bill's author, reinforcing the collective agreement on the importance of ensuring the safety of cosmetics and personal care products.

In summary, the meeting underscored a strong consensus among committee members and supporters regarding the necessity of AB 60, with no opposition noted. The committee's discussions reflect a proactive approach to addressing public health concerns related to toxic substances in consumer products. Further actions and decisions regarding the bill are anticipated as the legislative process continues.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Comments

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Family Portal
    Family Portal