In a recent meeting of the California Assembly Judiciary Committee, discussions centered around the implications of a proposed constitutional convention, particularly in relation to Senate Joint Resolution 1 (SJR 1). Advocates, including representatives from the League of Women Voters and the California Nurses Association, voiced strong support for the resolution, emphasizing the need to protect democratic rights and prevent potential threats to the Constitution.

Vic Ammar, a law professor at UC Davis, provided critical insights into the complexities and risks associated with calling a constitutional convention. He highlighted that while constitutional amendments can be beneficial, the uncertainty surrounding the process of a convention raises significant concerns. Ammar pointed out that there are numerous unanswered questions regarding representation, the scope of topics that can be addressed, and the authority of Congress in relation to any amendments proposed by the convention.

The committee heard arguments that California should distance itself from any movement that could undermine democratic principles. The League of Women Voters specifically urged a vote to remove California from the list of states supporting what they termed a "dangerous path" toward a convention.

As the committee deliberated, members expressed their appreciation for the expertise shared by witnesses, including Ammar, who underscored the potential risks of a convention that could lead to unintended consequences for the state's governance and the rights of its citizens.

The meeting concluded with a call for further discussion and consideration of SJR 1, as committee members recognized the importance of safeguarding the democratic framework that has been established over decades. The outcomes of this meeting may have lasting implications for California's role in national constitutional discussions and the protection of civil rights.