The Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee of the California State Senate convened on June 30, 2025, to discuss significant budget bills, particularly focusing on Senate Bill 1 31 (SB 1 31). The meeting featured a range of stakeholders expressing strong opposition to the bill, citing concerns over environmental protections and transparency in legislative processes.

The session began with Jacob Evans from the Sierra Club, who urged the committee to amend SB 1 31 to eliminate exemptions for advanced manufacturing and to enhance protections for endangered species habitats. He criticized the bill for being negotiated in secrecy and for its broad definitions that could lead to detrimental environmental impacts.

Following Evans, Raymond Contreras from Lighthouse Public Affairs presented support for the budget bills from various organizations, including Habitat for Humanity San Francisco. However, this support was met with counterarguments from environmental advocates. Desiree from the Asian Pacific Environmental Network emphasized the need for amendments to ensure community accountability and adequate implementation of the bill.

Melissa Romero from California Environmental Voters echoed these sentiments, expressing strong opposition to the bill's proposed changes to core health and safety laws. She called for a commitment to amend the language to protect habitats and remove exemptions for advanced manufacturing.

The committee heard from Amanda Bartel, an environmental scientist, who voiced concerns about the erosion of public trust in state government due to perceived corporate interests undermining environmental protections. She highlighted the challenges faced by state scientists in implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) due to underfunding and staffing issues.

Yordan Prenda Carvajal, representing California EMB and the California Apartment Association, expressed support for SB 1 31, particularly its provisions. However, this support was met with further opposition from state scientists and environmental advocates, including Hannah Johnson, who stressed the importance of maintaining CEQA's integrity and adequate staffing for its implementation.

The meeting continued with testimonies from various stakeholders, including archaeologists and community representatives, who underscored the importance of preserving cultural resources and ensuring meaningful consultation with tribal nations. They argued that the bill could lead to irreversible damage to California's historical and cultural heritage.

As the meeting progressed, the consensus among many speakers was clear: there is significant concern regarding the potential impacts of SB 1 31 on environmental justice communities and the lack of public input in the legislative process. Many urged the committee to reconsider the bill and prioritize transparency and community engagement.

In conclusion, the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee's meeting highlighted a critical dialogue surrounding SB 1 31, with numerous stakeholders advocating for amendments to protect environmental and community interests. The committee is expected to vote on the bill soon, with many urging a reconsideration of its provisions to ensure accountability and environmental protection.