The California State Senate's Business, Professions and Economic Development Committee convened on June 30, 2025, to discuss Assembly Bill 1504, which proposes to extend the California Massage Therapy Council (CMTC) for another four years. The meeting highlighted significant opposition from stakeholders advocating for the establishment of a formal state licensing board for massage therapists.

Key concerns were raised regarding CMTC's lack of oversight and accountability. Opponents argued that the council has failed to implement a formal complaint process and has been involved in controversial practices, including ignoring court orders. One witness, representing A to Z Health Massage School, described a prolonged investigation process that left their institution in limbo for two years without resolution. They emphasized the need for due process and a transparent system that would allow for fair hearings and timely investigations.

The committee members listened to testimonies that painted a troubling picture of CMTC's operations, with claims of biased hearings and inadequate communication. Critics urged the committee to reconsider the bill and conduct a thorough investigation into CMTC's practices, arguing that the current system allows for unchecked power and adversely affects hundreds of massage therapists seeking certification.

In response to the opposition, the bill's author acknowledged the concerns but highlighted recent amendments aimed at improving transparency and protecting sensitive information. He noted that the bill would allow CMTC to withhold certain records to protect human trafficking survivors, while also addressing the need for greater accountability in executive compensation within the council.

As the committee deliberated, the future of AB 1504 remains uncertain, with the potential for significant changes to the regulatory landscape for massage therapy in California. The discussions underscored the ongoing debate about the effectiveness of CMTC and the urgent call for reform in the licensing process for massage therapists. The committee is expected to continue evaluating the implications of the bill and the broader issues surrounding massage therapy regulation in the state.