Connecticut leaders oppose sale of Aquarian Water Company citing representation issues

In a pivotal public comment hearing held by the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA), community leaders voiced strong opposition to the proposed change of control for Aquarion Water Company. The meeting, which took place on June 30, 2025, highlighted concerns over the potential inequities that could arise from the transaction, particularly regarding representation and accountability for local communities.

As the hearing unfolded, speakers emphasized that the proposed structure would allow a minority customer base to dictate the water future for the majority, raising alarms about fairness in governance. One speaker passionately argued that any transfer of control over such a vital resource must ensure that all communities have a voice, warning that the current proposal risks disempowering Aquarion's customer base and jeopardizing service quality and investment priorities.

The discussion also turned to financial implications, particularly regarding a pilot program that could significantly alter property tax contributions from Aquarion. Concerns were raised about the potential for reduced funding for municipalities, with one speaker recalling past experiences where promises made by the state were not upheld, leading to substantial revenue losses. This sentiment resonated with many, as they expressed fears that the proposed changes could further disadvantage communities in Western Connecticut, which already contribute significantly to state revenues.

First Selectwoman Jen Tooker of Westport echoed these sentiments, reinforcing the collective opposition from various towns and leaders. She highlighted the need for transparency and representation in the decision-making process, urging PURA to reconsider the implications of the sale.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that the voices of local leaders were united in their call for a governance structure that truly reflects the communities served by Aquarion. The outcome of this hearing could have lasting effects on water management and community representation in Connecticut, leaving many residents anxious about the future of their essential water services.