In a significant Senate session on June 27, 2025, Arizona lawmakers debated a contentious bill aimed at restricting foreign ownership of real estate near military bases. The bill, which seeks to prevent foreign nationals from purchasing land within 50 miles of key military installations, sparked a heated discussion about constitutional rights and national security.

Senator Epstein voiced strong opposition to the bill, highlighting concerns that it discriminates based on nationality, which he argued contradicts the principles of the U.S. Constitution. He emphasized that while protecting military bases is crucial, the approach of blanket restrictions against individuals from certain countries is both prejudicial and un-American. Epstein ultimately voted against the bill, citing its potential constitutional violations.

Conversely, Senator Dunn expressed support for the legislation, underscoring the importance of safeguarding military bases like Luke Air Force Base and Yuma Proving Ground from potential threats. Dunn argued that the bill strikes a necessary balance between national security and property rights, and he voted in favor of the measure.

The final tally showed 19 votes in favor, 10 against, and one senator not voting, indicating a divided opinion among lawmakers on this critical issue. As the bill moves forward, its implications for property rights and national security will continue to be a focal point of discussion in Arizona's legislative agenda.