In a heated session of the Oregon House Committee on Rules, local leaders voiced strong opposition to House Bill 3402 and its Dash 3 amendment, arguing that it neglects critical transportation needs across the state. The meeting, held on June 27, 2025, saw mayors and county commissioners from various regions express their concerns about the bill's potential impact on local infrastructure and public safety.

Mayor Keith Wilson of Portland opened the discussion with a stark warning about the consequences of the proposed legislation. He highlighted that the bill would lead to significant job losses within the city’s transportation department, jeopardizing essential services such as pothole repairs and traffic safety improvements. "This bill puts our transportation system at risk," Wilson stated, emphasizing that the loss of 60 staff members would severely hinder the city's ability to maintain its infrastructure.

Commissioner Gabe Shepherd from Benton County echoed these sentiments, criticizing the bill for failing to uphold the long-standing 50-30-20 funding split that allocates transportation revenues to local governments. He noted that Benton County has $40 to $50 million in road repairs that would go unfunded if the bill passes, leaving communities without necessary maintenance and safety upgrades.

The concerns were not limited to urban areas. Coos County Commissioner Drew Farmer pointed out that the bill disregards the needs of rural communities, stating, "We need to be included when there is funding." He also raised issues regarding the socioeconomic implications of the proposed gas tax, which he argued disproportionately affects lower-income residents.

Mayor Lacey Beatty of Beaverton delivered a passionate plea, urging committee members to consider the long-term consequences of passing the bill. "Supporting a package that props up the state's bottom line while shortchanging local government is shortsighted and irresponsible," she warned, reminding lawmakers that their constituents depend on local infrastructure for daily needs.

The Oregon Transit Association also weighed in, with General Manager Alan Pollock highlighting the potential loss of hundreds of transit jobs if the bill is enacted. He stressed that without adequate funding, many Oregonians would lose access to reliable public transportation, which is vital for reaching jobs and essential services.

As the meeting concluded, the consensus among local leaders was clear: the Dash 3 amendment fails to address the urgent transportation challenges facing Oregon's communities. They urged the committee to reject the bill and instead support a comprehensive transportation package that prioritizes safety, equity, and sustainability for all Oregonians. The future of Oregon's transportation system hangs in the balance as these discussions continue, with local leaders advocating for a more inclusive approach to funding and infrastructure development.