In a recent meeting of the Oregon House Committee on Rules, significant concerns were raised regarding proposed legislation that could impact transportation funding across the state. Advocates and community leaders voiced strong opposition to House Bill 3,402, arguing that it would lead to cuts in essential transit services and safety improvements, leaving many Oregonians without reliable transportation options.

One speaker emphasized that the bill, which includes tax increases and vehicle fees, fails to address the pressing need for investment in public transit and safe infrastructure. "No safety investments mean they keep going up," they stated, highlighting the potential dangers of neglecting transportation funding. The speaker urged the committee to reject HB 3,402 and instead support House Bill 2025, which aims to create a comprehensive transportation package that fully funds transit services, safe routes to school, and community paths.

Joey Baughn, Executive Director of the Oregon Just Transition Alliance, echoed these sentiments, noting that the proposed legislation does not adequately support low-income and rural communities that are already facing challenges related to transportation access. Baughn pointed out that many residents depend on reliable transit options, and the lack of investment in these areas could exacerbate existing inequalities.

The discussions during the meeting underscored a growing urgency among community advocates for a transportation strategy that prioritizes safety and accessibility. As the committee considers these bills, the voices of those advocating for equitable transportation solutions are becoming increasingly prominent, reflecting a broader call for action to ensure that all Oregonians have access to safe and reliable transportation.

As the legislative session progresses, the outcomes of these discussions will be crucial in shaping the future of transportation in Oregon, with advocates urging lawmakers to prioritize the needs of their communities over budget cuts that could jeopardize public safety and accessibility.