A heated debate unfolded during the Oregon House Committee on Rules meeting on June 27, 2025, as stakeholders voiced strong opposition to House Bill 3,402, which proposes an increase in gas taxes without addressing critical transportation needs. Advocates from the Oregon Trails Coalition and the Oregon Environmental Council highlighted that the bill fails to invest in essential infrastructure like local streets, off-street paths, and public transit, which are vital for the safety and mobility of Oregonians.

Stephanie Noll, representing the Oregon Trails Coalition, emphasized that the proposed measure neglects the voices of over 80% of Oregonians who rely on local trails and safe routes for daily activities. "This measure does nothing to address the funding shortfall for off-street paths or the lack of flexibility for local governments to invest in safety," she stated, urging lawmakers to consider alternative solutions that prioritize community safety and connectivity.

Christopher Fortin Grijalva from the Oregon Environmental Council echoed these sentiments, criticizing HB 3,402 as a "half measure" that overlooks the broader transportation system's needs. He called for a more comprehensive approach, advocating for House Bill 20,025, which he described as a practical compromise that aligns better with the demands of Oregonians for sustainable transit and safe streets.

The meeting revealed a palpable sense of frustration among advocates, who expressed concerns that the current legislative efforts are falling short of expectations. Sarah Iannarone, executive director of the Street Trust, articulated a feeling of betrayal among constituents, stating that the proposed bill merely maintains the status quo at the Oregon Department of Transportation while failing to address the pressing needs of non-drivers and vulnerable road users.

As the committee deliberates, the future of Oregon's transportation funding remains uncertain, with advocates urging lawmakers to prioritize comprehensive solutions that truly reflect the needs of all Oregonians. The outcome of this debate could significantly impact the state's transportation landscape and the safety of its residents.