The Oak Grove Planning Commission convened on June 26, 2025, to discuss a variance request related to a proposed cul de sac for the Wickstrom Estate South development. The meeting began with the introduction of the applicant, Jerry Bauer, who explained the need for the variance due to the cul de sac being shorter than the required minimum of 500 feet as per the city’s subdivision ordinance.

Claire, a staff member, provided an overview of the variance request, noting that the preliminary plat application had previously been tabled due to comments from the Department of Natural Resources and necessary survey work. The applicant's new configuration, which includes the shorter cul de sac, aims to maximize the development potential of the site, allowing for more lots than initially planned.

During the discussion, Bauer emphasized that the variance would enhance the neighborhood's appeal by creating a more attractive layout with two lots adjacent to a wetland area. However, he acknowledged that without the variance, redesigning the layout would be challenging.

Commissioners raised questions regarding the implications of the cul de sac's design and its impact on the overall development. Some expressed concerns about the aesthetics and functionality of the proposed layout, referencing past developments and their outcomes.

Public comments were invited, with one resident, Joshua Steven Dejarles, inquiring about the meaning of signs indicating a potential future extension of the cul de sac. Another resident, Courtney Brown, submitted a letter opposing the variance, citing concerns about wildlife disruption and the environmental impact of the proposed development.

The commission noted the opposition to the overall development rather than solely the variance request. The staff recommendation was to deny the variance based on the criteria for practical difficulties, which must be met for approval. The meeting concluded with a call for further discussion on the practical difficulties criteria before making a final decision on the variance request.

The commission plans to reconvene to further evaluate the proposal and consider the public feedback received during the meeting.