The Austin Ethics Review Commission convened on June 25, 2025, to address a significant complaint involving Councilman Siegel and allegations of campaign finance violations. The meeting featured a rebuttal from the complainant, Mr. Haynes, who clarified that his complaint was filed independently and not on behalf of the Bledsoe campaign, countering claims made by the respondent.

Mr. Haynes emphasized that he was a volunteer supporting a long-time friend in the Texas legislature, asserting that his complaint was based on personal observations rather than any campaign affiliation. He detailed allegations that the Siegel campaign coordinated with a third-party entity that engaged in campaign activities without properly reporting these as expenditures, which he argued constitutes a violation of city ethics codes.

The commission's proceedings included initial statements from both parties, followed by a structured presentation of evidence. Each side was allotted 30 minutes to present their case, including witness testimony and documentary evidence. The chair of the commission, navigating the meeting's procedural rules, ensured that both parties adhered to the allotted time for their presentations.

As the meeting progressed, Mr. Haynes indicated that he would reserve part of his time for witness testimony, while the commission members prepared to review the evidence presented. The outcome of this hearing could have implications for campaign finance practices in Austin, highlighting the importance of transparency and adherence to ethical standards in local elections. The commission is expected to deliberate on the findings and determine the next steps in the investigation.