The Amarillo City Council held a regular meeting on June 24, 2025, addressing several community concerns and administrative matters. The meeting began with public comments, where residents voiced pressing issues affecting their neighborhoods.

One significant concern was raised by a concerned parent regarding safety at a local intersection near a school. The parent highlighted a recent incident involving a child being struck by a vehicle, emphasizing the urgent need for improved traffic control measures. They proposed the installation of a designated crosswalk with a push-button signal for students to safely cross during peak school hours. The parent noted that the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is currently reviewing the situation but expressed frustration over the lack of a timeline for implementation.

Hope Castillo McCoy, another resident, addressed the council with concerns about the allocation of $39 million found by the Amarillo School District. She argued that these funds should be used to revitalize the North Side of Amarillo, which she believes has been neglected. Castillo McCoy urged the council to focus on improving conditions for all residents, not just those in more affluent areas, and to recognize the contributions of North Side citizens to the community.

Mike Fisher, a resident, raised questions about the city’s decision to outsource staffing for city services, suggesting that this practice may not be cost-effective. He proposed that the council consider changing the agenda release timeline to allow more time for public review and input before meetings.

Additionally, Mike Ford brought attention to a procedural issue regarding a special election canvass, asserting that it did not comply with legal requirements and could be subject to challenge. He urged the council to address this matter promptly to avoid potential legal complications.

The meeting concluded with a discussion on the consent agenda, where item 8k was pulled for further review. The council approved the remaining items unanimously.

Overall, the meeting highlighted ongoing community concerns about safety, resource allocation, and procedural transparency, with residents actively seeking the council's support for improvements in their neighborhoods. The council acknowledged these issues and committed to reviewing the suggestions made during public comments.