The Rockwall Historic Preservation Advisory Board convened on June 19, 2025, to discuss several key topics related to the development of a new commercial structure adjacent to residential areas. The meeting focused on building setbacks, facade materials, fencing, and parking requirements.

The first item on the agenda addressed the orientation of the new commercial building, specifically a theater, which is being positioned closer to North Clark Street. This adjustment aims to minimize its impact on nearby residential properties. Although the building will not face Clark Street directly, its proximity to the street is intended to create a buffer from residential areas.

Discussion then shifted to the building facades and materials. The board emphasized the importance of using original or complementary exterior materials. The existing theater features lap siding and board and batten siding, while the new structure will incorporate similar materials along with masonry and a standing seam metal roof, which has become popular in recent developments.

The design of the roof was also reviewed. The existing structures utilize both gable and hip roofs, but the new building will adopt a hip roof design, aligning with the architectural style of the area.

Fencing requirements for the commercial property were another significant topic. A 20-foot landscape buffer is typically required for commercial properties adjacent to residential zones. The applicant is seeking to reduce this setback to 10 feet to accommodate parking needs. They propose a wood fence with a row of trees, arguing that this choice better reflects the character of the residential neighborhood compared to a masonry wall or wrought iron fence.

Parking arrangements were discussed next. The plan includes off-street parking located behind the main structure, with additional spaces on the north side to meet parking requirements.

Public notices regarding the project were sent out to 34 property owners and occupants within a 200-foot radius of the site on June 4, 2025. While no objections were received initially, one notice of opposition was submitted after the deadline, which was acknowledged during the meeting.

The applicant, Jonathan Brown, was present to address any questions from the board. The meeting concluded with an invitation for further inquiries from board members and the public, ensuring transparency and community engagement in the development process.