In a recent San Jose City Council meeting held on June 17, 2025, significant discussions centered around the implementation of new ordinances addressing homelessness and property rights, particularly focusing on the controversial issues of van lording and trespassing.

The meeting began with a clarification regarding the Brown Act, which mandates public deliberation on council actions. Council members reflected on the previous week’s vote concerning ordinances that had sparked public concern over aggressive enforcement measures against the unhoused population. The council had voted to allow police to arrest homeless individuals who refuse shelter, a decision that has drawn criticism for its perceived harshness.

Councilmember Cohen emphasized the need for a balanced approach, advocating for the implementation of a trespassing ordinance while also requesting an information memo detailing the plans for its execution. This request highlights the council's intent to ensure that enforcement does not disproportionately impact vulnerable populations.

The discussion then shifted to the proposed van lording ordinance, aimed at curbing the exploitation of individuals living in recreational vehicles (RVs) on city streets. Councilmembers expressed concerns that the current language of the ordinance might inadvertently target those living in RVs rather than the landlords profiting from leasing them. Legal advisors confirmed that the ordinance could be revised to focus on the rental aspect without penalizing the tenants, which aligns with the council's intent to protect vulnerable individuals.

Vice Mayor Foley raised questions about the clarity and purpose of the ordinances, particularly regarding the requirements for property owners to report trespassing. The council acknowledged the need for clear and accessible reporting mechanisms to empower property owners while ensuring that enforcement does not create additional barriers.

The meeting concluded with a commitment to refine the language of the ordinances to eliminate ambiguity and enhance their defensibility in court. The council's discussions reflect a broader concern for balancing public safety, property rights, and compassion for the unhoused, as they navigate the complexities of these pressing social issues.

As the council prepares to revisit these ordinances, the implications of their decisions will undoubtedly resonate throughout the community, shaping the future of homelessness policy and property rights in San Jose.