The Kingston City School District (KCSD) Board of Education meeting on June 18, 2025, was marked by heated discussions surrounding the controversial decision to eliminate the Montessori program at George Washington Elementary School (GW). Parents and community members expressed their outrage over what they described as misleading financial claims and a lack of transparency in the decision-making process.
One of the most significant points raised during the meeting was the assertion that GW was spending $2,000 more per pupil than other schools in the district. A parent, who identified themselves as having a background in accounting, challenged this claim, stating that even when accounting for additional costs associated with the Montessori program, GW remained the least funded school in the district. They emphasized that GW's spending was still below both the state and county averages, highlighting a disparity in funding that they deemed unacceptable.
The parent further criticized the superintendent for presenting inaccurate comparisons of teaching assistant numbers between GW and another school, JFK, arguing that such comparisons were misleading due to differences in student populations and program requirements. This prompted calls for a more thorough review of the financial data and the decision to cut the Montessori program, which has been a staple in the community for nearly two decades.
In addition to financial concerns, parents voiced their frustration over the lack of public input before the decision was made. They argued that the Montessori program has a strong demand within the community, with over 76 students opting to enroll. The abrupt decision to eliminate the program, they claimed, disregarded the community's investment and commitment to Montessori education.
Several speakers urged the board to reconsider the decision, suggesting that maintaining a small number of Montessori classrooms could be a viable compromise. They argued that the Montessori approach has proven effective for many students, particularly those struggling in traditional educational settings. The community members emphasized the need for equitable access to diverse educational methods, asserting that the Montessori program provides essential tools for learning that benefit a wide range of students.
The meeting also included a presentation on the district's safety plan, which is set to undergo a 30-day public comment period. However, the focus remained largely on the Montessori program and the implications of its potential elimination.
As the board deliberates on these issues, the community's response underscores the importance of transparency and accuracy in educational funding discussions. The outcome of this situation could have lasting effects on the educational landscape in Kingston, as parents and advocates continue to push for a reconsideration of the Montessori program's future.