In a pivotal meeting of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee held on June 18, 2025, California lawmakers gathered to discuss a contentious request for an audit of the Delta Conveyance Project, one of the largest infrastructure initiatives in the nation. The project, aimed at modernizing a segment of the state water system, has already seen hundreds of millions of dollars spent on planning and environmental reviews, raising concerns about transparency and accountability.

Assemblymember Ransom, who introduced the audit request, emphasized the need for oversight, stating, “Californians deserve to know how this money is being used and whether it complies with applicable laws.” He highlighted that the project is accruing costs at an alarming rate of approximately $1.5 million per day, yet there is a lack of clarity on how these funds are categorized and spent. Ransom argued that the audit would not only ensure responsible governance but also reinforce public trust in state institutions.

The urgency of the audit stems from the project's controversial nature, with many voters previously expressing opposition to such large-scale water diversion efforts. Ransom pointed out that despite these concerns, the project is advancing, and it is crucial to assess whether the financial assumptions and budget estimates are realistic, especially in light of rising construction costs due to inflation and supply chain issues.

Witnesses at the meeting, including attorney Roger Moore and Kelly Taber, echoed the call for an audit, stressing the potential risks to ratepayers and taxpayers. They argued that without a thorough examination, the financial implications of the project could lead to significant burdens on California residents, particularly those in economically disadvantaged communities.

In contrast, representatives from the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) and the Metropolitan Water District defended the project, asserting that previous audits had found no evidence of waste or fraud. They argued that the ongoing oversight and public deliberations already in place are sufficient to ensure accountability. DWR Director Carla Namath stated that the audit would be an unnecessary use of resources that could delay progress on the project.

As the committee deliberates on the audit request, the stakes remain high. With the Delta region home to millions of residents and vital ecosystems, the outcome of this meeting could shape the future of California's water management and infrastructure development. The committee's decision will not only impact the Delta Conveyance Project but also set a precedent for how large-scale projects are scrutinized in the state.