The Prince George Board of Appeals convened on June 18, 2025, to address a significant case regarding a variance request from local homeowners, Mr. and Mrs. Baizdeo. The meeting began with the chairman, Mr. Masedo, expressing sympathy for the petitioners but firmly stating that the board could not grant the variance due to the self-inflicted nature of the practical difficulty they faced.

The discussion centered on whether the Baizdeos' situation was indeed self-inflicted, as they had not obtained the necessary permits before commencing construction, which led to a violation notice. Board member Ruth Conti raised concerns about the role of the contractors hired by the homeowners, suggesting that they should have ensured the proper permits were secured. However, the board clarified that the responsibility ultimately lay with the homeowners, who could pursue action against their contractors if they felt misled.

After deliberation, Vice Chair Johnston moved to deny the petition for variance V2225, which was seconded by Board Member Stanton. The motion passed unanimously with a 3-0 vote. The board informed the Baizdeos that they would receive follow-up communication regarding the decision and potential next steps.

Following the variance discussion, the board approved the minutes from the previous meeting held on June 4, 2025, and concluded the session with a motion to adjourn at 7:17 PM. The meeting highlighted the board's adherence to procedural guidelines and the challenges homeowners face when navigating permitting processes.