The Township Planning Board of Washington Township convened on June 18, 2025, to discuss the municipality's affordable housing obligations and strategies for compliance with state regulations. The meeting focused on the township's housing development plans and the adjustments made to meet the requirements set forth by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA).

The board began by addressing the township's obligation to provide a total of 184 affordable housing units, a number determined by the DCA. After a vacant land adjustment process, this figure was reduced to 11 units. The board highlighted several projects that contributed to meeting this obligation, including a Habitat for Humanity project on Jefferson Street and a rental project on Franklin Court, which is currently under construction. Additionally, a monetary contribution from a property owner at 463 Van Emberg was noted, which added funds to the township's housing trust fund.

The discussion then shifted to the fourth round of housing obligations, emphasizing the significant changes in regulations since previous rounds. The board acknowledged the complexities introduced by new legislation, particularly regarding the calculation of unmet housing needs. The board's interpretation of the regulations suggests that they should calculate their required units based on 25% of the adjusted prospective need, which aligns with their current figure of 11 units. However, the Fair Share Housing Center has a differing interpretation, which could potentially increase the township's obligations significantly.

The board expressed confidence in their interpretation of the regulations, noting that many affordable housing attorneys support their position. However, they acknowledged that the final resolution of these interpretations may not be determined until the courts review the plans, likely in the coming winter or spring.

In conclusion, the meeting underscored the ongoing efforts of Washington Township to navigate the complexities of affordable housing regulations while addressing their community's needs. The board is currently considering two sites for the modest 11-unit requirement, reflecting their commitment to fulfilling their housing obligations in a manner that aligns with both state regulations and local development goals.