A Bay County Code Magistrate Hearing on June 18, 2025, highlighted urgent concerns over a hazardous property linked to ongoing drug activity. The magistrate denied a request for a three-month extension to rehabilitate the property, citing safety risks and inadequate plans for compliance.

The property owner’s representative, a seasoned real estate broker, argued for more time, emphasizing that the property was not as severely damaged as others in the area and that they were awaiting a settlement from the state to fund necessary repairs. However, the magistrate expressed skepticism about the timeline for the settlement and the adequacy of the proposed rehabilitation budget, which was estimated at only $6,700—far below the actual costs needed to bring the property into compliance.

Concerns were raised about the property’s condition, including a lack of a roof and potential dangers posed by its current state. The magistrate noted that the property had been a site of drug trafficking, further complicating the situation. Despite the broker's assurances that efforts were underway to clean up the property, the magistrate ruled that the risks were too significant to allow further delays.

Ultimately, the magistrate ordered that the county could proceed with abatement actions to address the violations, while waiving a $500 fine against the property owner. The decision underscores the county's commitment to public safety and the need to address properties that pose hazards to the community. The magistrate's ruling reflects a broader effort to tackle issues of neglect and illegal activity in Bay County, ensuring that residents can live in safer environments.