The San Antonio Zoning Commission convened on June 17, 2025, to discuss a proposed rezoning request for an assisted living facility in a residential area. The meeting featured public comments from both supporters and opponents of the project, highlighting the community's divided sentiments.

Mario San Roman, representing his family’s 28 years of experience in operating assisted living facilities in McAllen, Texas, presented the case for the new facility. He emphasized the calm environment and professional care that would be provided, assuring that residents would be non-harming elderly individuals cared for by certified staff. San Roman addressed concerns about potential ambulance traffic, stating that during their years of operation, they averaged only one ambulance visit every six months.

Opposition came from local residents, including Kevin Clark, a real estate broker, who expressed concerns about property values and the impact of having an assisted living facility in a predominantly residential neighborhood. He argued that potential buyers would be deterred from purchasing homes near such a facility, which could lead to decreased property values. Another resident, Patrick Zachary Cortez, voiced his apprehensions about safety and the presence of unknown individuals in the neighborhood, particularly with young children nearby.

In response to the public comments, San Roman reiterated the facility's commitment to safety and quality care, noting that their operations in McAllen had never resulted in incidents that would compromise neighborhood safety. He also mentioned that they were seeking a conditional use permit to operate with a maximum of nine residents, although they could legally accommodate up to six without such a permit.

The commission discussed the possibility of a two-week continuance to allow for further community engagement and feedback. San Roman indicated a willingness to collaborate with neighbors and local stakeholders to address concerns and clarify the facility's operations.

The meeting concluded without a final decision, as the commission considered the implications of the proposed facility on the surrounding residential area and the need for further discussions with community members. The next steps will involve continued dialogue to ensure that all voices are heard before any zoning changes are finalized.