[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6554934,"mediaKeyId","3868940-7b2e436fccbae244a469ad0badd4723d","parentId",3868940,"title","Commission continues request for adult residential care facility in District 10 to allow neighbor outreach","audioSeconds",1700,"startMs",517000,"endMs",2217000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3868940-7b2e436fccbae244a469ad0badd4723d&start=517&end=2217","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3868940-7b2e436fccbae244a469ad0badd4723d/thumbnail_517000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6554934/San-Antonio/Bexar-County/Texas/Commission-continues-request-for-adult-residential-care-facility-in-District-10-to-allow-neighbor-outreach","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6554934-05e523838baa43548323f4f3f4312f48/orig.mp4?Expires=1771181474&Signature=nezRoylVoMunadhyWmcqe7D2QTV31qt6CYFKWHnLHoBbGFyIIp6fcdyEMzzzt9WsUmUvcwyC5YjZHKZpn8w1Ucxl-mLsuu4X0OKL-bnEWhMTZm5EE6Gtt0Gh47nHBHX3l3g0MmyZXY7D5GxdfjGBHx1l5N8FXMl-4F7ftBP-bREWKKiIlRaiJgFKIIdgrjPPK2nymvAFIxD75WcrtTDdQ1-kBZpNGIDTC-U1d9Uaq3sLFK3ejMqTRis32vBq3auZfB35jOzAbHksfoVf4BuwkWm5J~QO1Nfv3qcPkeefCJypXfk4PMYurgHBVWE~px1tm7ddDuH7gnAg4SgpVAL6Jw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","San Antonio","date","2025-06-17T00:00:00Z","article","The Zoning Commission continued a request for a conditional‑use permit for an adult residential care facility in District 10 after substantial public concern and at the applicant’s request for additional neighborhood outreach.

The applicant, represented in part by Ivonne Giselle, asked to postpone the item; the commission approved a continuance to the July 1 meeting (date recorded on the roll call) after motion by Commissioner Widset and a second. The roll call recorded on the transcript shows the motion passed with the majority voting in favor and one recorded no vote by Commissioner Barros.

Members of the public expressed concern about lack of information about the proposed use. Several neighbors said they had not received sufficient notice and feared traffic and safety impacts from a facility that would house people unknown to nearby residents. One speaker said, “My daughter is 8 years old and I would not want nine people I do not know to be next door,” and another described the neighborhood as largely single‑family lots and worried about property values.

On the record, the applicant described the planned operation as an adult residential care facility and said licensing would limit capacity under current zoning. The applicant said the initial occupancy plan was for six residents once licensing was complete and that the facility could house up to nine in future if permitted; staffing would follow approximately one staff member for every four residents, with rotating shifts. The applicant also said residents are primarily ambulatory, that medical visits would be arranged to limit off‑site travel, and that the facility would remain outwardly residential (no large signs, structure must retain house appearance).

Commissioners asked clarifying questions about permitted capacity (staff reiterated that under current single‑family residential rules the structure must appear as a house and that conditional uses come with limits such as sign size and operating hours), staffing, visitation and whether the applicant could accept a short continuance to meet with neighbors. The applicant agreed to a continuance.

The commission’s action was procedural: the item was continued to allow further neighborhood outreach and additional details to be presented at the continued hearing. No permit or license was granted; the applicant must return with any requested clarifications and the item will be heard again on the continued date.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","San Antonio - Comisión de Zonificación Jun 17, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Zoning Commission continued a conditional‑use request for an adult residential care facility in District 10 to the July 1 meeting to allow more neighborhood outreach and to let the applicant answer resident questions.","taxTitle","San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas","taxId",2771,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6554938,"Commission approves C‑2 pedestrian rezoning at Southwest Boulevard with site‑plan limits for car sales",1614,3850000,5464000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3868940-7b2e436fccbae244a469ad0badd4723d&start=3850&end=5464","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3868940-7b2e436fccbae244a469ad0badd4723d/thumbnail_3850000.jpg","/articles/6554938/San-Antonio/Bexar-County/Texas/Commission-approves-C2-pedestrian-rezoning-at-Southwest-Boulevard-with-siteplan-limits-for-car-sales","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6554938-2353b2e89267a57bb8e4633834b79f6d/orig.mp4?Expires=1771181474&Signature=XWXpp9kWa6pHQ80dhnnkZzEvcj8OMaCQqL9dxY16Lyjqf4kN1jeOl5uV-kEAlLSLQPhdNAgF2~VfSwei6ZJn351IDlVM2i8nTqjusVIaPi3a2HmJXdNuQx0v1vvuE9VD8VtI9o2C4ctGqk3br6ooxy3sDe94acG0sDwslRDCxpJC2y1QczcdQES1SG0TtMBb6kUfYG2CDrnEBq2UYMP0ZqHfmPQYX7zQNKjv7vvWLrdsR4UbCq52MpdsoIksaMZZHKllP3bseAiabdx~r7tGkRAyhv4O6JALK9OxaivO3cN6r3llHy3vR7rJwysgzhP24GmJaXBTYBnfVme-cySjxA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Antonio Zoning Commission on Monday approved rezoning two parcels on Southwest Boulevard from R‑4 to C‑2 pedestrian commercial with conditions and a site plan amendment that permits a small vehicle sales use.

Commissioner (mover) made the motion to approve with the applicant’s site plan amended to allow car sales; Commissioner Barros seconded. The motion passed on a roll call recorded on the transcript; commissioners recorded in favor included Bustamante, Barros, Klms, Watson, Neujosa, Huey, Sipes and González.

City planner Alex Artones presented staff’s recommendation, describing the area as transitioning to commercial and industrial uses and saying that buffering and landscape mitigation would be required where the property abuts residential parcels. The staff recommendation noted existing commercial and industrial development nearby and recommended approval.

Applicant Mauricio Castillo told the commission the request is for a commercial pedestrian C‑2 designation and that the proposed use is a small business, not the metal‑recycling operations some neighbors referenced. He said the proposal was not for a metal recycling operation and that the site plan shown is for a small commercial use.

Neighbors and local organizations opposed the request or sought stronger conditions. Speakers raised longstanding concerns about alleged code violations at nearby properties, drainage from past demolition and paving, and uncertainty about what future businesses might locate at the site. Claudia González, who identified herself as the owner of a recycling business behind the parcels, disputed accusations that her business caused the cited violations and said some alleged violations related to other prior owners.

Commissioners asked staff whether certain uses—for example, major liquor sales or heavy industrial uses—would be permitted under C‑2 and the pedestrian overlay, and whether conditions could limit hours or particular operations. Staff said some uses require higher zoning designations or separate permits and that the site plan and conditional‑use restrictions can control several of the neighbors’ concerns.

The commission approved the rezoning with an amended site plan that includes parking and design limits; as discussed on the record, the site plan restricts the size of the vehicle‑sales operation to a small lot (applicant estimated 5–6 vehicles for sale at a time) and requires landscape mitigation between commercial and adjacent residential parcels. The item will be transmitted to city council for final consideration.

","The commission approved a rezoning request on Southwest Boulevard to C‑2 (commercial) with pedestrian overlay and an amended site plan that allows a small vehicle sales use. Neighbors raised concerns about past code violations and drainage; the applicant and property owners defended the proposal.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6554942,"Zoning commission approves C‑1 rezoning on West Mariposa Drive despite neighborhood objections",1519,2253000,3772000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3868940-7b2e436fccbae244a469ad0badd4723d&start=2253&end=3772","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3868940-7b2e436fccbae244a469ad0badd4723d/thumbnail_2253000.jpg","/articles/6554942/San-Antonio/Bexar-County/Texas/Zoning-commission-approves-C1-rezoning-on-West-Mariposa-Drive-despite-neighborhood-objections","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6554942-12b4bc060eb9b5bcd20f9d11fdc9f16a/orig.mp4?Expires=1771181474&Signature=VqXS-NIaSd-2U1~llNRAzNFddsOrnK4XcKVbnI42~MjS2B2XmG5HduHxJZvHD7NUzD1YlLR4diMWwnYOe-AUKrVODuEnuggVTeMoNPxMWLAIENDXumeHCr7f4j9pHes11TctmKaWvnQ2zXI8oFE3ILUEl6hijp3OE1sjK7BelLNGketopByexsMQkdfoSo2kO~pDj~SavjL1vXbuPSv2fh-s~TdtDGnQA7h--TBpMgvQAsaJUuV~M9RpqnGl7CeY9SZnqgoIMHM42loDsyVHWo~4fa3XRCmcHLTUDLTwrk1dQwH9OAo3d9UYlOMT~iWLTLY5KuEY2t-yd07bXbWTmw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Antonio Zoning Commission on Monday approved rezoning a vacant parcel on West Mariposa Drive from R‑4 (residential) to C‑1 (neighborhood commercial), despite repeated public opposition from nearby residents and the local historic‑neighborhood association.

The motion to approve was made by Commissioner Callow and seconded by Commissioner Barros. The motion passed in a roll‑call vote recorded by the clerk; commissioners on the record voting in favor included Barros, Watson, Jose, Huey, Sives, González and Samantha. The motion passed and the item will advance to city council for final action.

Staff planner Jonathan Fly, representing the property owners, told the commission the owners have been unable to sell the lot with its current residential designation and asked that it be rezoned to allow neighborhood commercial uses. Fly said the property is near existing C‑1 and commercial uses and that any future development would have to follow historic‑district design guidelines.

Neighbors and the Alamo Park historic neighborhood association urged the commission to deny or delay the request. Robert González, speaking on behalf of the Alamo Park association, said the neighborhood was opposed and provided a contact for the association. Multiple callers and speakers leaving voicemail objected, citing lack of information and the perceived risk that “vice” businesses could locate on the site; one voicemail caller said, “Estamos completamente opuestas a este enmienda” (we are completely opposed to this amendment).

Commissioners asked staff about what commercial uses would remain allowed under C‑1 and what limits could be imposed. Staff noted existing code limits such as small sign size restrictions, visitation and operating‑hour conditions the commission can place, and distance requirements that affect certain licenses. Commissioners also discussed whether the neighborhood association had been adequately notified and whether conditions could address neighbors’ concerns.

In closing remarks, the applicant reiterated outreach efforts and said he had attempted to contact neighbors multiple times prior to the hearing. The commission approved the rezoning with the site and design limitations described on the record; the item will move to city council for final consideration.

The decision does not itself authorize a specific business to open on the site; additional permits, site‑plan approval and any applicable licensing would be required before a use could operate.

What happens next: the approved rezoning will be transmitted to San Antonio City Council for final action. If council approves, future development will still be subject to site‑plan review and any applicable historic‑district design standards.

","The San Antonio Zoning Commission approved a request to reclassify a vacant lot on West Mariposa Drive from R‑4 (residential) to C‑1 (neighborhood commercial). Neighbors and a historic‑district representative opposed the change, citing transparency and possible future uses; the commission voted to approve after staff recommendation.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6554926,"Commission approves industrial‑general rezoning on Highway 10 site",253,5494000,5747000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3868940-7b2e436fccbae244a469ad0badd4723d&start=5494&end=5747","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3868940-7b2e436fccbae244a469ad0badd4723d/thumbnail_5494000.jpg","/articles/6554926/San-Antonio/Bexar-County/Texas/Commission-approves-industrialgeneral-rezoning-on-Highway-10-site","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6554926-9aa9d5edc3eacc53cb37bf0edbb53aa4/orig.mp4?Expires=1771181474&Signature=foQlb2RMsyQdLNIzLObzWgOZiH~Za7swkyi~zfPUsSy4X19ia~HEGZ9piWOEU2XwE4v7fgCpzxDVIUh5R-UnjmhK7JDmvjAST5MRnnJ1sCvtRrnP6k84rzYnQ91PfvS7pAeZPzYZ0K7ZzHyXDPIWvA3~cNeg1~5YJ5UP0vvgIjWhG9MqiUh5cqPiG8akJshnCFgH4tf27Ose~pV7EzVumCX7euXQ~Qy-tc3IYfWQiMiK6Y9jFWfzJ7wvRE0yptD21IK7MyRNEbgOOrVmGuOYER0ZM6oeQRpT-jgMeE0U~qbplxlbK9R5ehf7V6rCuH91vfF8JoyDsoUkcL0InxCsfw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Antonio Zoning Commission voted to approve rezoning for a parcel on Highway 10 to General Industrial (IG), finding the request consistent with surrounding development and staff recommendations.

Staff reported no opposition and said the property is separated from residences and aligns with other industrial and commercial uses along Highway 10. The applicant, Joshua Hain, represented the ownership and said the parcel has been in the family trust and used for parking but that the owners seek certainty for future industrial or commercial tenants.

Commission discussion was brief; commissioners recorded a motion to approve and the roll call recorded commissioners including Watson, Kelem, Aljosa, Hughie, González, Barros and President Bustamante voting in favor. The motion passed and the matter will be forwarded to City Council for final action.

No development permits or alterations were approved by the rezoning alone; any future use will require site‑plan review and applicable permits.

","The commission approved a request to reclassify a property on Highway 10 to General Industrial consistent with surrounding development. Staff recommended approval and no public opposition was recorded at the hearing.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6554930,"Zoning commission approves consent agenda items, including rules and two rezoning amendments",235,237000,472000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3868940-7b2e436fccbae244a469ad0badd4723d&start=237&end=472","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3868940-7b2e436fccbae244a469ad0badd4723d/thumbnail_237000.jpg","/articles/6554930/San-Antonio/Bexar-County/Texas/Zoning-commission-approves-consent-agenda-items-including-rules-and-two-rezoning-amendments","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6554930-9eadd3f11f6f180bf204672eff5e6a4e/orig.mp4?Expires=1771181474&Signature=O06YGfNvARRYuGB0FLV1ywrFj8tzcmFezzl5W8lzRlhhjRQ~JB-G4LiKtiRd6AWs~IycseQ~gLAjKuf6Q~t2ycReFYpx-k-IJc~304BbvUErmu9i5sBEzHx-XR5ami~sBDSmybEFc94U5~7fj-WSqKWs89WS~EeT4dWSGMVyBhtS-LLQedyPVPhdL2XetA0l9eSMAjB2K7rmhKsOjxYmn1vGCUQVmVIt-DgXHMRWw4M6DzbJAgsZqRt1rNzqG3pT8H1Q5CciK0DujLmcLAePH5DPQghlwXq6-UPHHUX-bdeOBG7C1RJ8oeS4PWevhm31pLw6oB7dfCbGw0Ds92C3Lw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Antonio Zoning Commission approved the consent agenda, adopting items 1, 2 and 5 as presented.

Item 1 finalized rules and procedures discussed at a prior meeting. Items 2 and 5 were staff‑recommended zoning amendments: item 2 changed a parcel from neighborhood commercial classification N30 to NC (commercial) with existing overlays maintained at 3010 Brinmore Drive; item 5 amended a zoning designation to MF‑33 for another parcel and a separate PT‑1 HL rezoning (addresses summarized on the record). Staff noted there is no registered neighborhood association for the affected addresses and that public comment was available on the consent items but those speakers had withdrawn for the consent vote.

A commissioner moved and a second was recorded; the roll call recorded on the transcript shows commissioners Hinojosa, Kelom, Sipes, González, Barros, Woodsett and President Bustamante voting yes and the motion passed.

As with other approvals by the commission, these recommendations will be transmitted to city council for final action where required.

","The commission adopted consent agenda items 1, 2 and 5. The package included procedural rules discussed at the previous meeting and two rezoning requests recommended by staff.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commission continues request for adult residential care facility in District 10 to allow neighbor outreach

Commission approves C‑2 pedestrian rezoning at Southwest Boulevard with site‑plan limits for car sales

Zoning commission approves C‑1 rezoning on West Mariposa Drive despite neighborhood objections

Commission approves industrial‑general rezoning on Highway 10 site

Zoning commission approves consent agenda items, including rules and two rezoning amendments