Moab City Council votes to amend Tourism Board bylaws amidst community concerns

In a recent Grand County Commission meeting held on June 19, 2025, significant discussions centered around the amendment of the Moab Tourism Board's bylaws, particularly regarding the representation of the city and the Chamber of Commerce. The meeting highlighted tensions between various stakeholders and raised questions about the decision-making process within the commission.

The primary focus was on a proposal to amend the bylaws to include a voting position for the city of Moab while potentially removing the Chamber of Commerce from its long-standing role on the board. Several commissioners expressed concerns about the implications of this change, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the Chamber's representation, which has historically played a vital role in supporting local businesses.

Commissioner Jacques voiced strong opposition to the proposed changes, arguing that the Chamber should retain its position without needing to sacrifice another member. He suggested that the commission explore alternative solutions, such as increasing the board's size rather than removing established members. This sentiment was echoed by other commissioners, who noted that the decision appeared rushed and lacked adequate discussion, particularly given the community's vested interest in the Chamber's involvement.

The meeting also revealed frustrations regarding the procedural conduct of discussions. Several commissioners called for a more organized approach to meetings, advocating for clearer communication and respect for all members' contributions. The debate over the bylaws amendment was marked by a lack of consensus, with some commissioners feeling that the process had been poorly handled and that the community's voices had not been sufficiently considered.

Ultimately, a substitute motion was proposed to expand the board to nine members, including both the city and the Chamber, which passed narrowly with a vote of 4 to 3. This decision reflects a compromise aimed at ensuring broader representation while addressing concerns about the Chamber's exclusion.

In addition to the bylaws discussion, the commission appointed Melody McCandless to the Echo Canyon preliminary municipality, a decision that received unanimous support. This appointment underscores the commission's ongoing efforts to navigate complex community issues while fostering collaboration among various stakeholders.

The meeting concluded with a recognition of the need for continued dialogue and a commitment to addressing the community's concerns moving forward. As the commission navigates these changes, the implications for local governance and community representation remain a focal point for residents of Grand County.