[{"_1":2,"_124":-5,"_125":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100,112],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6195564,"mediaKeyId","3861006-adfd8ccb47abf3c42a0b4fee71087c02","parentId",3861006,"title","House passes bill to centralize review of executive-branch IT projects and budgets","audioSeconds",454,"startMs",5667000,"endMs",6121000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3861006-adfd8ccb47abf3c42a0b4fee71087c02&start=5667&end=6121","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3861006-adfd8ccb47abf3c42a0b4fee71087c02/thumbnail_5667000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6195564/Oregon/House-passes-bill-to-centralize-review-of-executive-branch-IT-projects-and-budgets","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6195564-5adae27a9f06ffd35db060ca0da0bc42/orig.mp4?Expires=1770614471&Signature=Vv3smeaBwNgvMNS1sBHv3kh8xuSYYzVio-NcvfKrBSjn6qC1dDAiKUwmSPIg22azCcflLyRs2WsiSD~7vWCc5rROAl8RxKWo31E02pjSoYLnqDeoUPkoMLJukW4KpbTqnB5QkScVEbmWb8LrVJgR8qAoCTu~8pQAGUiX31a4hKDkFcgBRGgEiApeoItwqCGGNxqR~W4-dF2qF2oK9LnqAHuRTGgkBQKbGu3vWCLO14QAU1o~juga~wcGhaUDPHyUoLEe2zbbDhBSEoiFPyCJrnbPSPicsTABY2tucPboV2HBA7560bclBQSXKWR4AxcihRK4E2vubZWbVcmSuxvmZg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Oregon Legislature","date","2025-06-17T00:00:00Z","article","The Oregon House on June 17 passed Senate Bill 10 90, a measure directing the state Chief Information Officer to review executive-branch information-technology budget and project requests and submit a prioritized, enterprise-wide ranking to the governor and the joint legislative committee on IT before the governor issues a recommended budget.

Sponsor statements: Representative Daniel Winn, speaking in favor on the floor, said the bill \"helps the legislature see the big picture on tech, spend smarter, and modernize more strategically.\" He described the state's IT environment as decentralized and argued the measure would promote shared systems, cut duplication and prioritize projects that align with enterprise strategy.

Why it matters: the state plans to spend more than $2.3 billion on IT operations and projects in the current biennium, and lawmakers and staff said there is no single committee receiving a full cross-agency view of IT needs. Supporters argued the bill gives the legislature a consolidated view of IT priorities to inform funding decisions.

Debate and support: Representative Nathanson agreed, describing current practice as \"decentralized and disjointed\" and urged an aye vote. The bill was described as a modest but important step toward coordinated investment in enterprise IT and shared services.

Outcome: the clerk declared \"Senate bill 10 90, having received the constitution majority, is declared passed.\" Sponsors said the bill tasks the CIO with developing prioritization criteria, recommending shared services and flagging critical needs during the budget process.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","House Chamber Convenes 06/17/2025 11:00 AM","oneSentenceSummary","Senate Bill 10 90 tasks Oregon's state chief information officer with reviewing executive branch IT budget and project requests and producing a prioritized list for the governor and relevant legislative committees, aiming to reduce duplication and improve statewide IT strategy.","taxTitle","House of Representatives, Committees, Legislative, Oregon","taxId",17188,"location","Oregon","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6195568,"House approves change extending grievance window for executive session records to 90 days",241,4496000,4737000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3861006-adfd8ccb47abf3c42a0b4fee71087c02&start=4496&end=4737","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3861006-adfd8ccb47abf3c42a0b4fee71087c02/thumbnail_4496000.jpg","/articles/6195568/Oregon/House-approves-change-extending-grievance-window-for-executive-session-records-to-90-days","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6195568-9823f9c4a9cab59aa74be7a54a03c72d/orig.mp4?Expires=1770614471&Signature=KKosofC5Yy8CUpmA1CkYBPK09FtndWHsrdzFFWi7QSFojkWw8PaCWXwdXzB0Rrhg26hqc2nprQ3qeYUhT4mh5qSrJTXq3AojtNiQIgacTwBAiiKedK38q3L7PLsr~b24K6rO~QsfkwdInqZgUaK8h71LV6mZ-2yLwpeEqqDKzOv7lvnQNUzT-M10Y4MpOP5By06hgoj7OWWMAvWfCG~2NsyAj34qv6TyExmKbXVNB7RJ6Q7M5oBblT8PlF~mfRQGcRnFbEHjRZQVFp9czu24KTSZYj~EifOq~gxDy2koWN8SdISmZNzDCFnJSdPcV-v2KhtnVXKr4Gu1BBupF7bb4A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Oregon House on June 17 passed House Bill 36 38 A, which modifies the timeline for filing grievances alleging violations of the public meetings law for executive sessions.

What changed: sponsors said the previous 30-day window to file grievances was too short because executive session records are often not public immediately. The amended measure allows grievances related to executive sessions to be filed up to 90 days after the records are made public.

Sponsor rationale: Representative Helfrich, who presented the bill, said the change \"ensures accountability without burdening our agencies\" and was developed after discussion with stakeholders, public agencies and transparency advocates. \"This bill isn't just a technical fix, it's about protecting public's right to know,\" Helfrich said.

Opposition concerns: Representative Walters, a former mayor and city councilor, said some executive session discussions — for example legal consultations with counsel — need confidentiality and that broadening public access could have chilling effects on necessary internal communications. \"Opening that up to the public record, I find concerning for our local officials,\" Walters said.

Outcome: the House voted and \"House bill 36 38 having received the constitution majority is declared passed,\" according to the clerk.

Implementation notes: the floor record shows the change arose from stakeholder negotiations and a unanimous -2 amendment adopted in the House Rules Committee, but the text places the filing trigger tied to the date records are made public, not the date of the executive session itself.","House Bill 36 38 (as amended) allows grievances alleging violations of public meetings law for executive sessions to be filed up to 90 days after records from those sessions are made public, extending the window to account for delayed public disclosure.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6195572,"House concurs with Senate amendments to climate and sustainability education language after floor debate",446,2213000,2659000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3861006-adfd8ccb47abf3c42a0b4fee71087c02&start=2213&end=2659","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3861006-adfd8ccb47abf3c42a0b4fee71087c02/thumbnail_2213000.jpg","/articles/6195572/Oregon/House-concurs-with-Senate-amendments-to-climate-and-sustainability-education-language-after-floor-debate","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6195572-9a92f6253a8f1ef97dfe527f4a84e87f/orig.mp4?Expires=1770614471&Signature=e77fS-RmRL5W4DAUgZhO3L1Pp5gYCoL-r9LWjJmKUEkEQY6c2sI7CuxTIGCrx8b6zqz-nUipALQInjUWEOgmHcoFer~H9FykSSVK9EHkPP97oMEjmOrgk3ev-x~n0SDm4-emFYxSMbmPT0KGo1u4mtC~8UZcbJFqrj7QIOZW4EmhDoFjNVfhxoUR0B7RMKQxIYoXQmZ3lINDX8-2RUPo1S1H4BWD4CvBvKBsEPMcUoq68OFz4hY3APDe6CzPVlpbJIB-drEQkCN-ViMJd2QUD5WeHR4zgJwH4KKLZgSyX1i1vVfSAboElwjGBwpk9KgDrgzpP7dcQb4xYnEzKMYX9w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Oregon House on June 17 voted to concur in Senate amendments to House Bill 33 65 B, moving a measure that directs the State Board of Education to include climate and sustainability standards in state educational standards.

Why it matters: the bill affects what the State Board of Education will include in statewide teaching standards and drew debate about whether the guidance would amount to an unfunded mandate or duplicate material already in state-approved health curriculum.

Floor discussion: Representative Hudson, the bill sponsor, said the Senate version enumerates specific courses to be considered and that the measure remains consistent with the house version's spirit. Opponents urged a no vote on policy and on grounds of imposing new requirements without additional funding.

Representative McIntyre objected to language in the existing Oregon Department of Education health curriculum that references dietary choices, saying: \"One of the lines in there is it says very clearly, eat less meat... I am a hard no on this bill.\" Representative Mannix and others framed their opposition around concern for adding more bureaucratic requirements to schools after recent appropriations for education.

Sponsor response: Representative Hudson said the bill provides accurate information to students and does not \"dictate our behavior\" but offers standards consistent with current science; she argued that preventing students from learning established science would be more objectionable.

Final action: the clerk recorded that \"House bill 33 65 B having received the constitutional majority is declared repassed.\" The House proceeded with the roll call and the motion to concur was adopted.","The House concurred in Senate amendments to House Bill 33 65 B, which directs inclusion of climate and sustainability standards in state education standards; floor debate focused on curriculum content, funding and classroom mandates.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6195577,"House repasses forest-products harvest tax extension to fund forestry research, wildfire response and education",2286,3452000,5738000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3861006-adfd8ccb47abf3c42a0b4fee71087c02&start=3452&end=5738","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3861006-adfd8ccb47abf3c42a0b4fee71087c02/thumbnail_3452000.jpg","/articles/6195577/Oregon/House-repasses-forest-products-harvest-tax-extension-to-fund-forestry-research-wildfire-response-and-education","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6195577-9f8249e6c745ec87e4f6e5dc0be3dc0e/orig.mp4?Expires=1770614471&Signature=MkzHzctOGGgIFvk4DRSPwuwPXzcq1WgvrJLOn0J17nQzCCmRbUZ16EqIm9ZXvqCQ2qFqKguzSUYPVRwoQ4ecUzvvdOuhYx8BGAzn3LeXIgPRDCoOuqlmusn7u8khVWd4L4bDJ1f5mNYFFz9R15FCUZZmcvBAR40EkHc6JUUwaKB3n3vZyWBfxq4NgJwI6hpaEDNffYlPay8ND~3w96glGpvgVKdsmHqWF4qDvQSTDshUYYnnL6Tvx5~QUjCwdySHHBPJYijHT1yxgpyu3sJwrtlJr0hW38gIlJvPGyztFqGOfcYqHYY7HKYkhDy-tzr7-X4P6zXDR3oIX-juihR~hw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Oregon House on June 17 repassed House Bill 2,072, which extends components of the forest products harvest tax for calendar years 2026 and 2027 and adjusts certain rates described by sponsors as necessary to fund forestry research, wildfire suppression and professional forestry education.

Why it matters: the tax provides revenue used by Oregon State University research labs, the Department of Forestry's administration of the Oregon Forest Practices Act, professional forestry education at OSU's College of Forestry and a mitigation fund tied to aquatic species protections.

What the bill does: Representative Owens told colleagues the bill \"extends 3 components of the forest product harvest tax for the 2026 and 2027 calendar years\" and that the measure \"adjusts the tax rate of harvested forest products.\" He said the amendment keeps rates supporting forest research, fire suppression and forestry education at 90¢, 62.5¢ and 21¢ per thousand board feet, while modifying the rate tied to administration of the Forest Practices Act to meet a 40% funding target for that program; a new rate was described by the sponsor on the floor.

Debate and context: sponsors described the harvest tax as an industry-supported mechanism that has operated for decades. Representative Owens said the tax functions like a fee the industry self-imposes and that it typically secures bipartisan support.

Votes and outcome: after floor debate and a roll call, the clerk announced \"House Bill 2,072, having received the constitutional majority, is declared passed.\" The House recorded individual votes during the roll call and opened the voting system for members to change votes before final declaration.

Implementation: the sponsor said administrative and implementation details are included in the statutory text and that a separate wildfire package (House Bill 39 40, noted on the floor) could further adjust wildfire-related rates if enacted. The Legislature’s Joint Committee on Ways and Means recommended approval of HB 2,072.","House Bill 2,072 extends and adjusts components of Oregon's forest products harvest tax to maintain funding for forest research, wildfire suppression and forestry education; lawmakers debated the measure as a longstanding industry-supported revenue tool.",{"_33":113,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":114,"_41":115,"_43":116,"_45":117,"_47":118,"_49":119,"_51":120,"_53":121,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":122,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":123,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6195582,"Oregon House approves bill to enable privately backed financing for proposed MLB stadium in Portland",1603,6247000,7850000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3861006-adfd8ccb47abf3c42a0b4fee71087c02&start=6247&end=7850","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3861006-adfd8ccb47abf3c42a0b4fee71087c02/thumbnail_6247000.jpg","/articles/6195582/Oregon/Oregon-House-approves-bill-to-enable-privately-backed-financing-for-proposed-MLB-stadium-in-Portland","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6195582-d24f990a177685a2c4746887cc9df527/orig.mp4?Expires=1770614471&Signature=MLlC3yqR8GXj2GI-YYVKqUpXEGLfTFFoit78ggIRW~LoK23pRrSnfelB2c40xX1ptRSYEuDvXzdU5~DkX5eZsuxswIUh9yueui55JS5U1bk7F7dgfXTsCB8uco6yw6lT0q6h9kGMpKIOLdbjQSFIDOuOBHmPerEKJU-Ljgs8CNBVBAwAckA6Mynukvfujj1JDFHOhl7Xlf25~u2-EIGZTinnqsjQZjCaLQN5kGyrES074~UBTWxIsUtpR2crDMbQ2lvViXbTa0U8xAInwM2VBW-URxpt~P20pN6M0apGrvKYYXXmy6ydB8nIQGpKTcov6VbYaTH6ATTE7FUw1Ieb6w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Oregon House on June 17 passed Senate Bill 110, a measure that raises the cap on incremental baseball tax revenues and authorizes a financing structure intended to support construction of a Major League Baseball stadium in Portland without imposing new state taxes.

Supporters said the bill creates a privately secured-bond model that shifts financial risk away from the state and aims to spur jobs and local economic activity. \"Senate Bill 110 increases the amount of incremental baseball tax revenues that the Oregon department of administrative services may grant for the purpose of constructing a major league baseball stadium,\" Representative Graeber said on the House floor.

Why it matters: sponsors and backers said the measure could drive construction jobs and permanent positions tied to a stadium, expand tourism and local business activity, and produce long-term state revenue once bonds are repaid. \"This is not a curveball. It is a win win,\" Representative Nelson said, arguing the stadium would bring jobs, tourism and recurring economic activity.

Details and debate: the measure raises the prior funding cap to align with current construction costs and increases the minimum stadium cost threshold used to calculate incremental revenues. Proponents emphasized the financing method uses privately secured bonds and revenue from player and employee payrolls rather than creating a new tax on Oregonians. As Representative Graeber put it on the floor, \"Senate bill 110 does not impose 1¢ of new taxes on the people of Oregon. With the approach we are taking via privately secured bonds, there is no financial risk to the state via this mechanism.\"

Opponents and concerns: lawmakers who questioned the bill raised concerns about public safety, transportation, and precedent for public support of large private projects. Representative Osborne urged more testimony and said he wanted clarity on public-safety plans, noting prior reductions to Portland police funding and asking how the city would address crime and security. \"They haven't done a darn thing, and they don't have a plan to do a darn thing,\" Osborne said of Portland's city leadership in the context of those concerns.

Votes and next steps: after hours of debate and multiple members speaking for and against the measure, the House declared the bill passed. The clerk recorded that \"Senate bill 110, having received the constitutional majority, is declared passed.\" The bill now proceeds according to legislative process for any remaining steps toward enactment.

The measure’s supporters said they expect private partners and developers to undertake the stadium financing and construction. Critics on the floor asked for additional hearings and detail on ancillary infrastructure such as transportation and policing that lawmakers said would be needed if a stadium moves forward.","The Oregon House passed Senate Bill 110, raising caps and adjusting the financing framework to support construction of a proposed Major League Baseball stadium in Portland using privately secured bonds and projected payroll-related revenues.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

House passes bill to centralize review of executive-branch IT projects and budgets

House approves change extending grievance window for executive session records to 90 days

House concurs with Senate amendments to climate and sustainability education language after floor debate

House repasses forest-products harvest tax extension to fund forestry research, wildfire response and education

Oregon House approves bill to enable privately backed financing for proposed MLB stadium in Portland