The San Francisco County Land Use and Transportation Committee convened on June 16, 2025, to discuss a proposed zoning plan aimed at addressing the city's housing crisis. The meeting featured a range of public comments reflecting diverse perspectives on the plan's implications for affordability, community displacement, and urban development.

Kent, a representative of the YIMBY (Yes In My Backyard) movement, expressed enthusiasm for the proposed zoning changes, emphasizing the need for affordable housing to attract and retain diverse communities, including working-class individuals and LGBTQ+ families. He urged the committee to consider the voices of those who are currently unable to participate in the housing market.

Conversely, representatives from Connected SF voiced strong opposition to the plan, citing a projected decline in San Francisco's population and questioning the necessity of the proposed housing units. They argued for a more balanced approach to growth that aligns with realistic population forecasts.

David Kim, a long-time renter and soon-to-be father, supported the zoning plan, linking the need for increased housing to broader social issues such as homelessness and economic stability. He highlighted the importance of creating a livable environment for families.

Rosa Shields from the San Francisco Labor Council raised concerns about the potential negative impacts on low-income families and small businesses, advocating for protections against displacement. She shared personal experiences of eviction, underscoring the need for a comprehensive plan that addresses affordability and community stability.

Other speakers echoed similar sentiments, with some advocating for targeted zoning that preserves the character of historic neighborhoods while allowing for necessary growth. Concerns were raised about the potential for luxury developments that do not meet the needs of average residents.

The committee also heard from small business advocates who warned of the potential displacement of local businesses due to the proposed zoning changes. They called for proactive measures to support small enterprises and ensure that community voices are heard in the planning process.

In conclusion, the meeting highlighted the complex interplay between housing development, community preservation, and economic equity in San Francisco. As the committee considers the proposed zoning plan, the diverse opinions expressed reflect the urgent need for a balanced approach that addresses the city's housing crisis while safeguarding the interests of its residents and businesses. The next steps will involve further deliberation and potential revisions to the plan based on public feedback.