The BOMA meeting held on June 16, 2025, in Spring Hill, Tennessee, focused primarily on the selection of a new city administrator. The discussions highlighted the challenges and considerations faced by the board as they evaluated candidates for this critical position.

The meeting commenced with remarks from various board members expressing their appreciation for the candidates who had applied. Alderman Jimenez emphasized the effort put into the selection process, noting the importance of choosing the right individual to lead the city. He expressed his support for Mr. Napier, citing the guidance of current leadership as a significant factor in his decision.

Alderman Davis echoed similar sentiments, praising Mr. Clousey for fostering a positive culture within the city. She highlighted the need for a collaborative leader who can effectively communicate with constituents and promote teamwork. Davis also expressed her support for Napier, believing he embodies these qualities.

Alderman Murray contributed to the discussion by stressing the importance of relationship-building within the city’s leadership. He acknowledged the qualifications of all candidates but ultimately decided to support Napier, appreciating the current administration's efforts in navigating challenges.

Alderman Warner raised concerns about the potential risks of hiring a new administrator who may not fit the existing team dynamics. He expressed his confidence in the current administration and suggested that the board take more time to evaluate their options, although he pledged to support whichever candidate the board ultimately chose.

Alderman Hartwell urged the board to give the candidates a chance, emphasizing the need for a strong leader who can handle the city's challenges. He also expressed his support for Napier.

Conversely, Alderman Kanepari stated he could not support any of the candidates presented, indicating a desire for further evaluation of the selection process.

Alderman Jimenez concluded the discussions by addressing concerns about the possibility of seeking new candidates. He argued that the board had conducted thorough evaluations and that the current candidates, particularly Napier, were well-suited for the role.

The meeting underscored the board's commitment to finding a capable leader for Spring Hill, with a consensus forming around Mr. Napier as the preferred candidate. The board's deliberations reflected a careful consideration of the city's future and the qualities necessary for effective leadership.