During the recent Town of Red Hook Board of Trustees meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the proposed use of eminent domain to acquire the Ruddick Boat Club property. Community members expressed their apprehensions about the potential impact of this decision on local residents and the environment.

Nancy Rogers, a member of the Bridal Bull Club, initiated the discussion by questioning the transparency of the board's communication with property owners. She emphasized the need for assurance that their emails and concerns were being considered seriously, highlighting the moral and ethical implications of a potential "hostile takeover." Rogers urged the board to keep the boat club in the hands of its current owners, reflecting a broader sentiment among community members about the importance of local stewardship.

Rich Ross, representing the camaraderie of the Red Bull Club, echoed these sentiments, warning that the unilateral decisions made by the board lacked transparency and community input. He pointed out the potential safety hazards associated with the Hudson River and questioned the financial viability of the proposed acquisition, estimating that compliance costs could reach up to $5 million. Ross also raised concerns about the broader issues facing the community, such as wastewater management and affordable housing, suggesting that these should take precedence over the acquisition of waterfront property.

Karen Stewart, a local kayaker and powerboat owner, added her perspective, noting that many boaters prefer to launch from the opposite side of the river due to safety concerns. She highlighted logistical challenges, such as parking and access for trailers, which could complicate the board's plans for increased public access to the river.

Lisa Murray, a concerned resident, expressed shock at the board's consideration of eminent domain, questioning the rationale behind taking private property for public access. She called for a town vote on the matter, emphasizing that residents should have a say in such significant decisions that could affect their taxes and community resources.

Emily Manjiri criticized the lack of transparency from the board, urging members to listen to the community's concerns and reconsider their approach. She pointed out that the boat club has been a longstanding part of the community and questioned the necessity of using eminent domain for river access when other options exist.

The meeting concluded with a reminder of an upcoming public hearing, where residents will have the opportunity to voice their opinions formally. The discussions highlighted a strong community desire for transparency and careful consideration of the implications of government actions, particularly regarding property rights and local resources. As the board prepares for the public hearing, the voices of concerned residents will likely play a crucial role in shaping the future of the Ruddick Boat Club and the broader community.