Columbus Council reviews new zoning proposal for Founders Park housing development

The Special Meeting of the Development Commission held on June 12, 2025, in Columbus, Ohio, focused on several key development proposals, including a significant rezoning request for the Saunders Park area. The meeting began with a proposal aimed at repurposing an underutilized surface parking lot to create more housing, aligning with the city’s objective to increase residential options across all neighborhoods. The city department recommended approval, noting no traffic issues associated with the proposal.

Daniel Mayer, representing the owner and Development Architecture Collaborative, discussed plans to enhance the density of the area by utilizing the surface lot for parking rather than garages. The proposal had received unanimous approval from the area commission and was set to be presented to the city council for variances on July 18.

The meeting then shifted to the contentious rezoning request for Saunders Park, which has faced significant opposition from local residents. The site is currently governed by previous zoning ordinances that established multiple sub-areas with specific development standards. The new request seeks to create a new sub-area, D2, allowing for a 60-unit apartment building, which has raised concerns among neighbors regarding traffic, parking, and property values.

Michael Metz, president of the Harrison West Society, expressed his long-term involvement with the project and highlighted the community's previous support for balanced development. However, he noted that the latest proposal deviates from earlier agreements and could disrupt neighborhood cohesion. The Harrison West Society officially recommended disapproval of the rezoning.

In contrast, representatives from Thrive Companies, including Austin Lindsey and Dave Perry, defended the proposal, emphasizing the need for increased density and the project's alignment with city goals. They acknowledged community concerns but argued that the development would provide necessary housing and amenities.

The meeting concluded with a statement from the homeowners association representing residents directly impacted by the proposed changes. They expressed strong opposition to the rezoning, urging the council to reject the application to maintain the neighborhood's integrity and livability.

Overall, the meeting underscored the ongoing tension between development goals and community concerns, setting the stage for further discussions as the city council prepares to review the proposals.