A proposed rail and trail project in Ulster County is stirring significant debate among local legislators, with calls for further investigation before any decisions are made. During a recent meeting of the Ulster County Legislature, Legislator Stewart emphasized the potential economic benefits of combining rail with trail along the UMD Corridor, highlighting its promise for tourism and job creation. However, he raised concerns about the feasibility of the project due to topographical challenges and the narrowness of the corridor, which does not meet recommended standards.

Stewart criticized the lack of input from the executive branch and the absence of official reports from planning and economic development, calling these oversights "grave." He pointed out the contentious history between the county and the Catskill Mountain Railroad, which has faced scrutiny for operating without proper permissions and for its dealings regarding state funding.

The discussion took a turn as Legislator Criswell noted the voices of local residents who have expressed a preference for trails over railroads, suggesting that their concerns have not been adequately addressed. This sentiment was echoed by other legislators who received feedback from constituents opposing the railroad's presence.

In light of these complexities, Stewart proposed postponing the vote on the resolution to allow for further studies, including a sound study to assess the impact of train noise on nearby residents and an exploration of a potential land swap to enhance the project’s viability. The motion to postpone was met with support, indicating a desire for a more thorough examination of the implications of the proposed rail and trail project before moving forward.

As discussions continue, the future of the Catskill Mountain Railroad and its role in the community remains uncertain, with legislators seeking a balanced approach that considers both economic development and the concerns of local residents.