Natural Gas Industry Defends Health Effects Claims from University of Pittsburgh Study

In a recent meeting of the Consumer Protection, Technology & Utilities Committee held by the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, significant discussions centered around the health impacts of natural gas development, particularly in light of a study conducted by the University of Pittsburgh. The meeting highlighted contrasting interpretations of the study's findings, particularly regarding asthma and cancer rates associated with natural gas production.

A representative criticized the University of Pittsburgh study, asserting that it inaccurately portrayed the health effects of natural gas development. They pointed out that, despite a 200% increase in production from 2014 to 2020, severe asthma cases reportedly declined by 50%. The representative claimed that the study's methodology was flawed, as it categorized nearly all asthma cases as severe, inflating the numbers. Furthermore, they argued that the study's findings on cancer, particularly lymphoma, indicated only a minimal association with natural gas activities, estimating a mere 0.006 percent compared to typical occurrences in the general population.

The representative emphasized that the study did not adequately account for various factors such as smoking status, prenatal care, and other environmental exposures, which could influence health outcomes. They noted that the researchers failed to correlate the timing of cancer diagnoses with actual natural gas development, leading to potentially misleading conclusions.

In addition to addressing health concerns, the meeting underscored the economic significance of the natural gas industry in Pennsylvania. The representative highlighted that the industry supports over 123,000 jobs across the state, with average wages significantly exceeding the median income. Furthermore, they reported that the industry contributes over $41 billion to the state's economy and pays substantial taxes and royalties, reinforcing its role as a critical energy source.

The discussions also touched on the importance of natural gas in providing electricity and heating for homes, framing it as essential to the quality of life in Pennsylvania. As the meeting concluded, questions arose regarding the Philadelphia Gas Works' methane reduction program, indicating ongoing efforts to address environmental concerns associated with natural gas production.

Overall, the meeting reflected a complex interplay between health, environmental, and economic considerations surrounding the natural gas industry, highlighting the need for continued dialogue and research in these areas.