Monroe County's Election Board is facing scrutiny over its recent contract with an IT firm, as concerns were raised about the use of subcontractors and the financial implications of the agreement. During a meeting on June 5, 2025, board members discussed the composition of a team of 20 involved in the project, questioning whether they are direct employees or subcontractors of the firm.

Mr. White, a presenter at the meeting, confirmed that the team consists of subcontractors and addressed inquiries regarding their access to voting machines and software. He noted that the software is provided by Hocker, a designated vendor. However, the clarity of the discussion was hampered by audio issues, prompting requests for repetition and clarification.

Monroe County Commissioner Julie Thomas emphasized the need for transparency, reiterating concerns outlined in a letter sent in May. She questioned whether the board had thoroughly reviewed the contract, explored multiple vendor options for competitive pricing, and considered the feasibility of handling IT needs in-house. A significant point of contention is the $100,000 allocated for non-election year costs associated with the contract, raising alarms about fiscal responsibility.

The meeting highlighted the importance of accountability in election-related expenditures and the necessity for clear communication regarding vendor agreements. As the board moves forward, it will need to address these concerns to ensure public trust in the electoral process and its associated costs.