The San Francisco Planning Commission convened on June 5, 2025, to discuss a public request for a discretionary review of a building permit application aimed at restoring five existing dwelling units at 785 San Jose Avenue. The proposed project includes a new third-floor vertical addition, a horizontal rear addition, and a two-story detached accessory dwelling unit (ADU) in the rear yard. This initiative seeks to address an enforcement case regarding previous unpermitted construction.

The requesters, Gary Bishop and Charity Reed, expressed concerns that the new third-floor addition would obstruct views, reduce light, and create privacy issues for their unit. They proposed an alternative plan to remove the upper floor and replace it with a roof deck to mitigate these concerns. Despite their objections, the planning department reported receiving 46 letters of support for the project, including seven from immediate neighbors. The department recommended approval, stating that the project complies with building codes and residential design guidelines.

During the meeting, Bishop and Reed articulated their worries about privacy, light reduction, and the overall character of the neighborhood. They argued that the proposed addition would significantly alter the scale of the building, making it the largest in the area. They also highlighted the importance of their views, which they believe contribute to the character of the Mission District.

In response, the project sponsor, Bob Nelke, and architect Dawn Ma defended the proposal, emphasizing its compliance with planning codes and the need for moderate housing in the neighborhood. They noted that the design includes setbacks to minimize visual impact and that the project aims to preserve the existing building's historic character while providing necessary housing.

Commissioners expressed sympathy for the requesters' concerns but ultimately found that the project met all regulatory requirements and did not present exceptional circumstances warranting a denial. The commission voted to approve the project, highlighting the need for additional housing in the city while acknowledging the challenges of balancing development with neighborhood character.