[{"_1":2,"_110":-5,"_111":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,98],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6543198,"mediaKeyId","3667125-4e7f6e067b2d287e9d3e59d3e1267c9d","parentId",3667125,"title","Commission approves consent agenda items excluding two pulled cases","audioSeconds",88,"startMs",1119450,"endMs",1208230,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3667125-4e7f6e067b2d287e9d3e59d3e1267c9d&start=1119&end=1208","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3667125-4e7f6e067b2d287e9d3e59d3e1267c9d/thumbnail_1119450.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6543198/San-Antonio/Bexar-County/Texas/Commission-approves-consent-agenda-items-excluding-two-pulled-cases","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6543198-e4e081497f8b77075b51fb57c34624e5/orig.mp4?Expires=1771157825&Signature=NMM6-ajqrubq6SmjEvWE~I6zvGQmIW58JmUTsAvGHwnT0lZBjsKS90VTskajqheqpp3kD9~U2Z2GMhvTCtUGBQGieneAbeF8u9Fspe-jAHB1Nq73U7UmLtKWA~qApf8Gd3OKecOlj9aPlsG6TUR3DleKBaJrvP1drlEEF8h73k8pj6nCjgEzRXiMYr5y7sC4bNXIJpa4CmP5X0Ghn2DDBSyYSmV4R3S9gTxwe03Fdogv58Z5CNsrPOv8S0z~RFVPhl0CHR~XB~bSEWj~kkyZiqA4HDGgOBOjjOqEhNDFrYMjaU8i8ZYlIH9O71mAiVHE~q53ZcKCHL3-ctJFfaOTxA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","San Antonio","date","2025-06-04T00:00:00Z","article","The Historic and Design Review Commission approved the remainder of the consent agenda after commissioners removed agenda items 1 (Pride Cultural Heritage District) and 5 (proposed building near Mission San Jos\u0000e9) for separate discussion.

Staff said certificates of appropriateness for the consent items will be prepared and emailed to applicants within 10 days. The transcript lists the consent cases approved on the record (language as spoken): \"94 27, Loop 410, Park View 879, East Asby, 20 26 West Magnolia and 2 40 Smallwood.\" The commission recorded the roll call in the transcript and the consent motion carried.

Because these were handled on consent, the record contains no extended discussion for each case; details specific to each case were contained in staff reports and are not recited in full on the meeting transcript.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","San Antonio - Comisión de diseño y revisión histórica Jun 04, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Historic and Design Review Commission approved multiple consent agenda cases and removed items 1 and 5 for separate discussion; certificates of appropriateness will be issued by staff.","taxTitle","San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas","taxId",2771,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6543203,"Design commission approves alterations at 303 Cedar Street with staff conditions",460,2510410,2970950,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3667125-4e7f6e067b2d287e9d3e59d3e1267c9d&start=2510&end=2970","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3667125-4e7f6e067b2d287e9d3e59d3e1267c9d/thumbnail_2510410.jpg","/articles/6543203/San-Antonio/Bexar-County/Texas/Design-commission-approves-alterations-at-303-Cedar-Street-with-staff-conditions","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6543203-e341ecfb1c9a414e247378db95b29d69/orig.mp4?Expires=1771157825&Signature=m1vxN~YfKWsKWbqDAKrOVa-zY-mMvlMY8bAK1jzA-ZMrrTYlwNZ7DKDeGiheHU1l0VCrsAinZYBleaW7TmTEZvJHkLhP1jgL8nx4bN4KuwMeaiEuimrA9NsT1pFMDqfSP1Ico2aSOnRmqmGs9kDcm3RX4hLMCEV-qDm7PR7cm5zzpo4ghSwr9~DeriOuX46~7Ek1HNoPVpbgcolpt2AhbIUEDYBvF-6fIck73wv3SIeCEjT6nFopzuTk5ikhqXCmPP--bo9g8JrKrlbFLuzs2EBiCszY26INX5LNBo-ZG0h5Hz2T~EMF~GclWOaZRoRmyDLXkTyr0o67s-KBisQHBA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Historic and Design Review Commission approved a request to alter and add accessory space at 303 Cedar Street, with staff conditions on materials and detailing.

The application requested removal of a rear structure and construction of about 956 square feet of accessory space, parking for two vehicles (one parking element later removed from review), installation of an iron vehicular gate and a ramp and approximately 100 square feet of ramp area plus landscape elements in and around interior and exterior yards, and roughly 1,000 square feet of rear-yard work (transcript text). Staff recommended approval with stipulations to preserve and salvage as much original material as possible and to provide detailed drawings and manufacturer specifications for exterior doors and columns.

Architect Kemeron Smith (identified in the record as the project architect) said the design team met with the King William association and would accept the staff recommendations; she confirmed the team would not raise the planting plan element that the association identified as problematic.

A voicemail from the King William architectural advisory committee questioned the elevated plantings, saying they could alter the historic character and trap moisture against foundations. The committee also requested further study of some window replacements because of an earlier addition on the house.

A commissioner moved approval with staff stipulations; the motion passed on roll call. The transcript records all commissioners voting yes on the motion.

Staff will follow up with the applicant on required submittals and details noted in the stipulations prior to issuance of any certificate of appropriateness.","The commission approved exterior alterations and accessory construction at 303 Cedar Street subject to staff stipulations about material reuse, window study and landscaping; the King William association raised concerns about raised planting areas and moisture entrapment.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":79,"_47":92,"_49":93,"_51":94,"_53":95,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":96,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":97,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6543207,"Commission defers review of proposed building near Mission San Jos—e9 after neighborhood concerns",1665,844710,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3667125-4e7f6e067b2d287e9d3e59d3e1267c9d&start=844&end=2510","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3667125-4e7f6e067b2d287e9d3e59d3e1267c9d/thumbnail_844710.jpg","/articles/6543207/San-Antonio/Bexar-County/Texas/Commission-defers-review-of-proposed-building-near-Mission-San-Jose9-after-neighborhood-concerns","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6543207-66b7eb04651e6fde61860cd6797230c2/orig.mp4?Expires=1771157825&Signature=ER93Y0yIq9nWkyQaGn61JIpYS2n2RrXDks~zNMcG4ZGGUEDq3y9jFhb5XzqqFKUMOpZTuzXiaVJZRSPqthpWjLgL425CTwej2wMHIxGVpe462FQKPx1l0GeJImZoyWyMaVgbnfna7a01fTHJvH8lvRc-voHkobuDbJpEv-jSnEcZ-nWk0Lnbhus3drJEbv5yPzgZEL8HmhSK16RrmASNt3ieseERAFrvqFCpFGgxJHqVZYMCdGJjEHEq8VU21Hf1wHznstE1MiAGaqSTfPfBaIaq3W4CezZgWii5eAQEJRwRqUjmZ9b9ihPAR78gbEE0PNlD47Ltx-~m1rcpMk7O5Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Historic and Design Review Commission removed an item concerning a proposed new building near Mission San Jos\u0000e9 from the consent agenda and voted to defer final action to a later meeting after neighbors and a Mission San Jos\u0000e9 representative said they had not been consulted.

Jane Henry, identified as president of Mission San Jos\u0000e9's settlers session, asked the commission to postpone review of the item (agenda item 5) because Mission San Jos\u0000e9 leaders and neighboring property owners had not been consulted on the proposal and because the project document set was extensive. \"We were not consulted at all,\" Henry said, adding concern about distance relationships to other homes, archaeological issues and the presence of an acequia (irrigation ditch) near the property.

Applicant Edward Hern\u0000e1ndez told the commission he and his team had not met with neighbors. Staff confirmed that neighborhood outreach is encouraged but not a legal requirement for this type of application; staff also said archaeological excavations had been performed and that no historic artifacts were documented in prior work mentioned at the hearing.

Several commissioners said they supported delaying the item so the applicant could meet with neighbors and the neighborhood association. One commissioner moved to continue the item to the commission's next meeting; the motion carried on roll call.

The transcript records the roll-call vote as: Menem yes; Sabino yes; Vel\u0000e1zquez no; Masuca yes; Guevara yes; Group yes; Cervantes no; Holland yes; Fetzer yes. The motion passed.

The deferral means the commission will re-notice the item for a future session; staff encouraged the applicant to consult with Mission San Jos\u0000e9 leaders and neighbors during the interim.","Commissioners removed the item from the consent agenda and voted to continue review of a proposed building near Mission San Jos\u0000e9 after a neighborhood group and Mission San Jos\u0000e9 representatives asked for more consultation and clarification on archaeological and site issues.",{"_33":99,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":100,"_41":101,"_43":102,"_45":103,"_47":104,"_49":105,"_51":106,"_53":107,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":108,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":109,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6543212,"Historic review panel approves Pride Cultural Heritage District after broad public support",1832,261450,2093770,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3667125-4e7f6e067b2d287e9d3e59d3e1267c9d&start=261&end=2093","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3667125-4e7f6e067b2d287e9d3e59d3e1267c9d/thumbnail_261450.jpg","/articles/6543212/San-Antonio/Bexar-County/Texas/Historic-review-panel-approves-Pride-Cultural-Heritage-District-after-broad-public-support","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6543212-c4a1d221da594e90eda26a403681dd2d/orig.mp4?Expires=1771157825&Signature=LxD4o0MhqJhsQ175pOqFu12RIQOgFEwD6JwdxOM0GKx5mSYi7W7r9ypGDD766553N07MrdkC5rZ-FxBccx09wPEfXgjiEKS3bSRrbx7kC~6fmrZ0wsIMvNIP3KJXt~gQrzQa5QCb7Y-oX9R0wD3rGXB-9m5UZtGTla-evNGWk7wZEsr7M4UZZX0Z9fYGl1s6gD~DJuJvtYm40WTuvzUkD2A6gbji-ZyRhaQdFKJb0UNqx6zYuwz39AiRUpOYcT6js9xY55Xj3FLMINkXHWYeB-wrEXaLdubgoReYfEnZLDZMZxfxXEh-Sk5RYE2O8IT0WftfyYuFEBOlYDFoLFPvJw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Antonio Historic and Design Review Commission voted to approve the designation of a Pride Cultural Heritage District following public testimony and commissioner discussion.

Supporters said the designation would formally recognize the neighborhood's long association with LGBT life and could help economic revitalization. \"This has been consistent in the last 22 years,\" said James Puente, who gave his address and described the area as \"a home for businesses and residences\" tied to the LGBT community. Luis V\u0000e1zquez, identified as secretary of the local LGBT Chamber of Commerce, said the district could attract small-business investment similar to other U.S. cities.

Gloria Colunga, the commission's cultural historian, explained the distinction the staff report used between \"culture\" and \"way of life,\" saying culture includes traditions, music, architecture and other expressive forms that the designation aims to acknowledge. \"The impact the LGBT culture has given San Antonio includes food, music, uses, spaces, architecture, art,\" Colunga said.

Commissioners heard contrasting views at the meeting. One commissioner said the report felt \"marginalizing\" and cautioned against putting culture in a geographic \"box.\" Other commissioners replied that the commission's task was to recognize a geographic district and that additional, citywide work to acknowledge culture could follow.

After discussion the commission moved the item for a vote. The roll call recorded on the transcript shows a majority in favor, with one commissioner recorded as absent; the motion passed.

The commission's approval establishes a locally recognized area intended to acknowledge and celebrate the LGBT community's historical and contemporary contributions in that part of the city. The designation does not itself change zoning or replace any other permit process; staff reminded the public that separate municipal permits remain required for physical work.

Speakers included several community members and local historians who urged unanimous approval, and the commission agreed to the designation by roll call. The commission staff will issue any certificates of appropriateness and related notices by email within 10 days, as is the standard process.","The San Antonio Historic and Design Review Commission voted to designate a Pride Cultural Heritage District after multiple public speakers and commissioners discussed the cultural and economic significance of recognizing LGBT history in a defined geographic area.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commission approves consent agenda items excluding two pulled cases

Design commission approves alterations at 303 Cedar Street with staff conditions

Commission defers review of proposed building near Mission San Jos—e9 after neighborhood concerns

Historic review panel approves Pride Cultural Heritage District after broad public support