The National City Special City Council meeting held on June 4, 2025, focused on community concerns regarding zoning changes and transparency in city governance. The meeting began with public comments from residents expressing their dissatisfaction with the current mixed-use zoning of a previously residential area. Activist speakers highlighted the negative impact of this zoning on the community and urged the council to revert the area back to residential status.

One resident passionately described their transformation into an activist, emphasizing the need for community engagement and the perceived injustice of the current zoning. They criticized the council members, specifically the Mayor and another council member, for prioritizing development over the needs of the residents they serve. The speaker also mentioned an ongoing ground lease that they believe should be terminated to facilitate the return to residential zoning.

Michael Aguirre, another speaker, raised concerns about the preservation of public records, specifically regarding text messages that the city’s IT department reportedly does not retain. He urged the council to take immediate action to restore residential zoning and to ensure that all relevant documents are made available to the public.

Further comments from residents echoed these sentiments, with calls for transparency and the release of documents related to the zoning changes. One speaker reiterated the community's desire for residential homes rather than mixed-use developments, emphasizing that the area has already been affected by the current zoning.

The meeting highlighted a growing frustration among residents regarding the council's responsiveness to their concerns and the perceived lack of transparency in city operations. As the discussions progressed, it became clear that the community is united in its demand for a return to residential zoning and greater accountability from their elected officials. The council's next steps in addressing these issues remain to be seen as the meeting concluded with a call for further dialogue and action.