In a tense atmosphere at the University of Nebraska Board of Regents meeting, voices rose in passionate opposition to proposed changes in the university's bylaws that would eliminate references to race, ethnicity, and gender identity. The discussions, held on April 11, 2025, revealed deep concerns among faculty, students, and community members about the potential impact of these changes on the university's commitment to diversity and inclusion.

As the meeting unfolded, speakers expressed their fears that the revisions were a reaction to recent federal directives rather than a reflection of the university's values. One faculty member, who has dedicated years to studying higher education, warned that removing protections for marginalized groups could lead to decreased student success, lower retention and graduation rates, and increased harassment. "When we don't have programs and policies that explicitly reflect who our students are, student success goes down," they stated, emphasizing the importance of supporting a diverse student body.

Crystal Garcia, an associate professor, echoed these sentiments, urging the board to reconsider the motivations behind the proposed changes. "What evidence has this administration presented that leads you to believe these bylaw changes are in the best interest of current and future Nebraska students?" she asked, challenging the board to reflect on the implications of their decisions. Garcia pointed out that compliance with federal guidance, which she described as harmful political rhetoric, would not necessarily protect the university from scrutiny or funding cuts.

Students also took to the podium, sharing personal stories about their experiences at the university and the importance of identity in their educational journeys. Zachary Bursch, a sophomore, highlighted the role of identity in shaping students' experiences and success. "By removing the ability to talk about [identity], you tell students that you do not care about them," he said, imploring the board to prioritize student welfare.

The meeting was marked by a palpable sense of urgency, as many attendees had submitted postcards and written statements opposing the changes. Ellie Calderon Palacios, a student at UNO, read aloud messages from her peers, emphasizing the potential harm these changes could inflict on first-generation and marginalized students. "Diversity is a strength," she declared, urging the board to uphold policies that support all students.

As the meeting progressed, it became clear that the proposed bylaw changes had ignited a broader conversation about the university's mission and values. The board members were left to grapple with the weight of their decisions, as the voices of students and faculty echoed the sentiment that the future of higher education in Nebraska depended on their courage to stand for inclusivity and equity. The outcome of this meeting could shape the university's identity for years to come, leaving many to wonder what path the Board of Regents will ultimately choose.