The Ellensburg City Council meeting on June 2, 2025, became a platform for a heated discussion surrounding the celebration of Pride Month, reflecting deep divisions within the community. The meeting featured passionate speeches from residents expressing contrasting views on the significance of pride celebrations and their implications for community values.

One speaker, citing various biblical passages, argued against the celebration of pride, claiming it promotes sin and undermines traditional values. This individual called for the city council to reconsider its support for Pride Month, suggesting that the imagery and activities associated with the event were inappropriate, especially for families and children. They emphasized a belief that pride is a sin and urged the council to remove the month-long celebration from the city’s agenda.

In stark contrast, another resident, Phil Backlund, representing the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Commission, advocated for inclusivity and acceptance. He quoted scripture to highlight the importance of loving one’s neighbor without exceptions, arguing that the city should embrace all individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation or identity. Backlund's remarks underscored a vision for Ellensburg as a welcoming community for everyone, free from discrimination.

The meeting also included voices expressing concern over the appropriateness of religious references in public discourse. One resident, Lisonbee Dermond, criticized the use of scripture in the context of city governance, arguing that it alienates non-Christian residents and perpetuates harm against marginalized groups. Dermond called for a reevaluation of the open comment period rules to prevent what they described as hateful speech.

Another speaker, Carrie Vickers, defended the notion of the United States as a nation under God, asserting that Christian values should be acknowledged in public life. Vickers expressed discomfort with the idea of being forced to expose her children to events that conflict with her faith, highlighting the ongoing tension between differing beliefs within the community.

The discussions at the meeting reflect broader societal debates about inclusivity, religious expression, and community identity. As Ellensburg navigates these complex issues, the city council faces the challenge of balancing diverse perspectives while fostering a sense of unity among its residents. The implications of these discussions will likely resonate beyond the meeting, influencing future policies and community relations in Ellensburg.