The Assembly Committee on Ways and Means convened on May 31, 2025, to discuss budgetary concerns, particularly regarding travel expenses and training funding. A significant point of discussion was the absence of a budget allocation for travel, raising questions about spending limits and reimbursement processes.

Assemblymember Mark Filson sought clarification on whether travel expenses would require prior approval from the Interim Finance Committee (IFC) or if they would be reimbursed after the fact. Gabriel De Cara, Chief Deputy Secretary of State, confirmed that reimbursements would occur post-travel, adhering to state administrative rules. Filson expressed hesitation about allowing unlimited travel spending, especially given the current fiscal situation.

Several committee members echoed Filson's concerns, suggesting that a cap on travel expenses would be more fiscally responsible. They noted that rural counties, which often lack resources, would benefit from travel opportunities to enhance their skills and network with colleagues. However, the need for budgetary constraints was emphasized to ensure responsible spending.

The committee also compared the current travel funding proposal to a previous Assembly Bill that included training costs. The fiscal impact of the training was noted to be significantly lower than the proposed travel budget, prompting further discussion on the differences in funding requirements.

Ultimately, the committee considered placing a cap of $200,000 on travel expenses, with the funds allocated to the IFC contingency account. This approach would require the Secretary of State's office to submit a work program for reimbursement, ensuring oversight and accountability.

The meeting concluded with a consensus on the need for budgetary limits, reflecting a cautious approach to state spending in light of ongoing fiscal challenges. The committee's decisions will play a crucial role in shaping future travel and training funding for state officials.