Nevada Senate hears testimony on SB 507 amid opposition from key stakeholders
June 01, 2025 | 2025 Legislature NV, Nevada
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The Assembly Committee on Government Affairs convened on June 1, 2025, to discuss Senate Bill 507 (SB 507), which has sparked significant debate among stakeholders. The meeting provided a platform for public testimony, revealing strong opposition to the bill from various representatives.
The primary focus of the meeting was the testimony regarding SB 507, which aims to implement changes affecting the funding and oversight of state boards, particularly the Contractors Board and the Taxicab Authority. During the session, no supporters of the bill were present to provide testimony, indicating a lack of backing for the proposed changes.
Richard Perkins, representing Yellow Checker Star Transportation, voiced his opposition, expressing concerns about amendments made to the bill without adequate stakeholder input. He highlighted that the proposed changes could lead to unnecessary policy shifts and urged for a delay until 2027 to allow for proper discussion and consideration of the implications.
Alexis Moderex, from the Nevada Chapter of Associated General Contractors, also opposed SB 507, emphasizing that the bill would impose additional fees on contractors without providing necessary services. Moderex argued that the bill would ultimately reduce the quality of services offered by the Contractors Board, which is known for its efficiency and self-funding model.
Patty Mamola, a former chair of Nevada's Board of Engineers and Land Surveyors, further criticized the bill, stating that it would fund new positions within the business and industry sector rather than addressing the actual needs of the boards. She argued that this approach would lead to increased costs for licensees without delivering significant benefits to the public.
The committee did not receive any neutral testimony regarding SB 507, and the hearing concluded without further remarks from the bill's presenter. The committee then recessed until further notice, leaving the future of SB 507 uncertain as it faces considerable opposition from key stakeholders.
The primary focus of the meeting was the testimony regarding SB 507, which aims to implement changes affecting the funding and oversight of state boards, particularly the Contractors Board and the Taxicab Authority. During the session, no supporters of the bill were present to provide testimony, indicating a lack of backing for the proposed changes.
Richard Perkins, representing Yellow Checker Star Transportation, voiced his opposition, expressing concerns about amendments made to the bill without adequate stakeholder input. He highlighted that the proposed changes could lead to unnecessary policy shifts and urged for a delay until 2027 to allow for proper discussion and consideration of the implications.
Alexis Moderex, from the Nevada Chapter of Associated General Contractors, also opposed SB 507, emphasizing that the bill would impose additional fees on contractors without providing necessary services. Moderex argued that the bill would ultimately reduce the quality of services offered by the Contractors Board, which is known for its efficiency and self-funding model.
Patty Mamola, a former chair of Nevada's Board of Engineers and Land Surveyors, further criticized the bill, stating that it would fund new positions within the business and industry sector rather than addressing the actual needs of the boards. She argued that this approach would lead to increased costs for licensees without delivering significant benefits to the public.
The committee did not receive any neutral testimony regarding SB 507, and the hearing concluded without further remarks from the bill's presenter. The committee then recessed until further notice, leaving the future of SB 507 uncertain as it faces considerable opposition from key stakeholders.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
View full meeting