On May 6, 2025, the Board of Health in Charlton, Worcester County, convened to address a contentious issue regarding a septic system installation that has led to significant disputes between neighboring property owners. The meeting highlighted the complexities surrounding property rights, local regulations, and community relations.
The primary concern arose when a new septic system was installed at 59 Cranberry Road, allegedly encroaching approximately four feet onto the adjacent property owned by the Chargey family at 57 Cranberry Road. The Chargeys expressed their frustration, asserting that they had not granted permission for the installation, contrary to claims made by the installer. This situation has not only caused property damage but has also strained relationships between the families involved, who previously had a friendly rapport.
During the meeting, various stakeholders, including the installer and local officials, discussed the circumstances surrounding the installation. It was revealed that the installation process faced challenges due to the site's irregular terrain, which led to modifications in the original plans. However, the Chargeys maintained that the installation was executed without proper oversight and that the installer did not adhere to the required distance regulations from property lines.
The Board of Health members emphasized the need for a resolution, urging both parties to consider options for moving the septic tank back onto the correct property. The Chargeys expressed their unwillingness to allow the original contractor back on their property, citing a lack of trust and concerns about further damage. They are seeking the removal of the tank and restoration of their land, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal standards to protect their property rights.
As discussions progressed, it became clear that the situation is not only a matter of property lines but also reflects broader issues of community trust and the responsibilities of contractors and local authorities. The Board of Health is tasked with finding a solution that respects the rights of both parties while ensuring compliance with health and safety regulations.
In conclusion, the Board of Health meeting underscored the complexities of local governance in resolving disputes that arise from construction and property rights. The Chargeys' situation serves as a reminder of the importance of clear communication and adherence to regulations in maintaining community harmony. The Board plans to facilitate further discussions to reach a satisfactory resolution for all involved parties.