The House Natural Resources Committee of the Louisiana Legislature convened on May 29, 2025, to discuss critical issues surrounding the state's coastal restoration efforts, particularly the controversial Mid Barataria Sediment Diversion project. The meeting was marked by significant concerns regarding the direction of the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority (CPRA) and its annual plan.

Chairperson Dove opened the session by reiterating that Sea Parade, a key stakeholder, does not plan to proceed with the Mid Barataria Sediment Diversion, which is a cornerstone of the state's coastal restoration strategy. This announcement raised alarms among committee members and witnesses, who argued that approving the CPRA's fiscal annual plan without this essential project undermines the integrity of Louisiana's Coastal Master Plan. Critics emphasized that the legislature cannot endorse a plan that is fundamentally flawed and lacks transparency.

Christie Trail, Executive Director of the Poncha Train Conservancy, expressed her dismay at the lack of scientific engagement in the decision-making process. She highlighted the importance of evidence-based approaches to coastal restoration and questioned the sustainability of alternative proposals being considered. Trail pointed out the significant land loss in the Barataria Basin and the potential negative impacts on local fisheries if the diversion project is not implemented as originally designed.

Lauren Berg from the National Audubon Society echoed these sentiments, emphasizing that the cancellation of the Mid Barataria and Mid Breton sediment diversions without public engagement or scientific justification jeopardizes the credibility of Louisiana's coastal restoration efforts. She urged the committee to demand transparency from the CPRA and to ensure that any plans presented are accurate and reflective of the state's commitments to its coastal communities.

Throughout the meeting, committee members sought clarity on the current state of coastal restoration efforts, with questions raised about whether the state is effectively managing land loss. The consensus among witnesses was that large-scale restoration is essential to address the ongoing challenges facing Louisiana's coast.

As the meeting concluded, the committee faced the critical task of determining the next steps in the approval process for the annual plan, with many urging caution and a thorough review of the proposed projects to ensure they align with the state's long-term coastal restoration goals. The discussions underscored the urgent need for a cohesive and scientifically grounded approach to managing Louisiana's coastal resources.