Parent Testifies Against SAU 16's Anti-Racist Curriculum Impacting Children's Mental Health

May 27, 2025 | Education, House of Representatives, Committees , Legislative, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Parent Testifies Against SAU 16's Anti-Racist Curriculum Impacting Children's Mental Health
In a recent meeting of the New Hampshire House Education Policy and Administration Committee, significant concerns were raised regarding the emotional impact of educational content on students, particularly in relation to race and historical events. The discussion centered around the implementation of educational programs that some parents believe are causing undue emotional distress among children.

One key testimony highlighted a troubling incident where a young girl came home in tears, feeling personally responsible for slavery. This incident sparked a broader conversation about how historical facts are taught in schools and the potential for students to internalize guilt based on their race. The speaker emphasized the importance of teaching facts without imposing blame on children for historical injustices, advocating for a more sensitive approach to education that considers the emotional well-being of students.

The committee also discussed the controversial English language arts program, Wit and Wisdom, which has faced legal challenges in other states due to claims that it negatively affected students' mental health. Parents reported that their children required emotional support after engaging with the material, raising questions about the appropriateness of certain educational content for younger audiences.

Additionally, the meeting addressed the financial investment made by SAU 16 in anti-racist literature for middle school students, which some parents found problematic. The concern was that such materials could inadvertently categorize students as either oppressors or oppressed, leading to confusion and distress among children of mixed backgrounds.

As the committee moves forward, the discussions underscore the need for a balanced approach to education that prioritizes factual learning while safeguarding the emotional health of students. The implications of these conversations could shape future educational policies and curriculum decisions in New Hampshire, as lawmakers seek to address the concerns of parents and educators alike.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Comments

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI