The Marion County School Board convened on May 22, 2025, to discuss critical staffing and budgetary issues affecting the district. The meeting focused on the implications of school-based staffing plans and the necessity of evaluating central office staffing before making further decisions.

The session began with a review of the previous year's staffing changes, noting a deduction of 28 units. Board members expressed differing views on the necessity of additional Assistant Principals (APs) at certain schools, with some advocating for a more streamlined approach to staffing. One board member emphasized the importance of addressing central office staffing cuts alongside any reductions in school-based positions, arguing that any discussion on staffing should be informed by the financial implications of central office cuts.

Concerns were raised about the impact of staffing decisions on student achievement, particularly regarding the roles of paraprofessionals in special needs and ESOL programs. The board member highlighted the need for data to support staffing decisions, stressing that positions directly affecting student learning should be prioritized over those that do not have a clear impact on educational outcomes.

The discussion also touched on the potential for cutting positions within academic services, with caution advised against assuming that all central office staff could transition into teaching roles. The board member pointed out that many positions in operations do not require teaching certifications, which complicates the narrative around staffing cuts.

Dr. Brewer provided an update on the financial implications of freezing central office vacancies, indicating that such a freeze could save over $6 million. However, Dr. Campbell cautioned that some of the positions being considered for freeze are essential for the district's success in the upcoming year.

The meeting concluded with a consensus on the need for a thorough evaluation of central office staffing before proceeding with any school-based staffing plans. The board agreed to continue discussions on these critical issues in future meetings, ensuring that any decisions made prioritize the best interests of students.