On May 20, 2025, the Adams County Board of Commissioners held a public hearing addressing concerns related to land use and community safety, particularly focusing on the impact of Martin Marietta's operations on local residents. The meeting began with a procedural vote to enter an executive session for legal advice regarding a pending land use case, which was unanimously approved by the commissioners.

The public comment segment featured several residents from the area, who expressed their frustrations and concerns about increased traffic, safety issues, and inadequate communication with Martin Marietta. Gail Palone, a local resident, highlighted the dangers posed by heavy traffic on their road, recounting an incident where an unknown individual entered her garage. She also raised issues regarding the maintenance of the road and drainage problems exacerbated by the gravel pit operations.

Shauna Du Bois, another resident, echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the lack of access to Martin Marietta's property without infringing on neighbors' land. She noted that the road, maintained by the community, ends at private driveways, complicating access for emergency services and increasing the risk of unauthorized traffic.

Sandy Johnson, a senior resident, pointed out the safety concerns for elderly residents in the neighborhood, while Rick Bose, a newer resident, expressed skepticism about the necessity of creating additional access points for Martin Marietta, fearing it would lead to more truck traffic without proper road maintenance.

Wayne Palone raised significant concerns about drainage issues, stating that the berms created by Martin Marietta could lead to flooding on his property. He criticized the lack of effective communication with the company regarding these issues, noting that promises to address drainage problems had not been fulfilled.

The meeting concluded with a recess, allowing the commissioners to deliberate further on the issues raised. The discussions underscored the community's growing concerns about safety, property rights, and the environmental impact of industrial operations in residential areas. As the board prepares for further discussions, residents remain vigilant about the implications of land use decisions on their quality of life.