The DWR RAC meeting held on May 22, 2025, in Utah focused on several key updates regarding regulations for outfitters and guides, particularly concerning hunting practices. The meeting aimed to clarify recent changes in rules and address public concerns about the implications for outdoor activities.
One of the primary topics discussed was the adjustment of the application renewal date for permits, which has been moved from December 31 to March 31 each year. This change was made to ensure clarity and compliance with existing regulations.
Another significant point raised involved the application requirements for operating on federal land. It was noted that both the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) require the same federal permits, which could create a bottleneck in the application process. A proposal was made to revise the language in the regulations to streamline this requirement, ensuring that applicants must obtain the proper federal land use permit and have it available in the field.
Concerns were also expressed regarding insurance requirements for outfitters and guides. Many guides operate as independent contractors, and there were calls to ensure that all state and federal laws regarding insurance are adhered to. The discussion highlighted the need for clarity on whether all guides, including those who assist with non-hunting activities, would still be required to meet these insurance standards.
Public comments during the meeting included questions about the reporting timeline for violations, which is currently set at 20 days. Some attendees felt this timeframe was excessive and could hinder timely investigations. Additionally, an outfitter raised concerns about the limitations placed on the number of assistants allowed during hunts, arguing that it could compromise safety and operational efficiency.
The meeting concluded with a recognition of the need for ongoing dialogue between regulators and the outfitting community to address these concerns and ensure that regulations support both conservation efforts and the practical realities of guiding in the field. The next steps will involve further discussions and potential adjustments to the proposed regulations based on feedback from the public and stakeholders.