[{"_1":2,"_121":-5,"_122":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6560270,"mediaKeyId","3459511-f5da2bdbdb43b5d906b6942ec399cb1d","parentId",3459511,"title","Votes at a glance: Huntington Township Planning Commission (April meeting)","audioSeconds",1651,"startMs",21000,"endMs",1672000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3459511-f5da2bdbdb43b5d906b6942ec399cb1d&start=21&end=1672","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3459511-f5da2bdbdb43b5d906b6942ec399cb1d/thumbnail_21000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6560270/Pennsylvania/Votes-at-a-glance-Huntington-Township-Planning-Commission-April-meeting","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6560270-74f72118d18b2c2afc24a07efa887460/orig.mp4?Expires=1770889564&Signature=WYUU3NbQsk-rNPbUmiWWVvK~taflYm7mlNSmU6E7rk-hnekJ2RwyEGFRFmBUkzVPAEi4k0z6x~QLZ7cnWiwXXHcOkeSQZg~8OCBSf7kez1mm9ywBil7DRs8DjyAIf5x02wIqC0m2Jxxcdpv4wJNJRcXL43kVnIegEfsDbPS5-ggsnYSNjmC-2~qiAzjpT~uxV-xG9nYD-N3NvBDfofhpVjjgUO5-7tEkwtTVnKJNJR8QaIlqqx7vUXNwUCCXVnYwBXs4mpdd~Vx-rTh5DJAhRi6zE0pDWSfIExh1m3n3AzYEwSlIaTwewVZ8MvA4AEJQpuO-tANJuVKoYpJuG1frPg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Huntington Township, PA","date","2025-05-04T00:00:00Z","article","The Huntington Township Planning Commission recorded these formal actions during its April meeting.

- Approval of minutes: The commission voted to approve the minutes of the March 24 meeting as presented. No roll‑call tally was recorded in the transcript; the chair called for the ayes and the motion carried.

- Authorization to sign BEP sewage module: The commission voted to allow the chairman to sign the BEP sewage module (sewage module/planning module) for 4J Farm LLC, enabling the chairman to sign the DEP sewage module on the board's behalf. The motion carried by voice vote; the transcript records the chair asking for a motion and commissioners voting in favor.

- Preliminary/final land‑development plan (EB Clearing): The commission voted to table the EB Clearing preliminary/final land‑development plan for 6745 Old Harrisburg Road to allow the applicant to address county and Soil Conservation District comments.

- Adjournment: The commission voted to adjourn; the motion carried by voice vote.

The transcript does not record detailed roll‑call vote tallies or the full names of every mover and seconder for each motion; outcomes are recorded as voice votes or unanimous 'ayes' in the meeting minutes as read aloud on the record.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","April 28, 2025 Planning Commission, Huntington Township, Adams County Pennsylavnia","oneSentenceSummary","Summary of formal actions taken at the Huntington Township Planning Commission April meeting: minutes approved, township chairman authorized to sign a BEP sewage module, EB Clearing land‑development plan tabled, meeting adjourned.","taxTitle","Huntington Township, Adams County, Pennsylvania","taxId",79792,"location","Pennsylvania","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6560274,"Public commenter raises concern about school district TVs at township electronics recycling event",279,2136000,2415000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3459511-f5da2bdbdb43b5d906b6942ec399cb1d&start=2136&end=2415","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3459511-f5da2bdbdb43b5d906b6942ec399cb1d/thumbnail_2136000.jpg","/articles/6560274/Pennsylvania/Public-commenter-raises-concern-about-school-district-TVs-at-township-electronics-recycling-event","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6560274-ea50a40d519d2469db6dbeb521f30beb/orig.mp4?Expires=1770889564&Signature=WhayZteKFvAPlKFEQazz5bP20y0MqqviKB~DqBGAAa2G-qrtyef9e42A8giNmdAYdKlunXUdBdMd1OfS2akS-hIn5lG-cH6yWmiDp7sfpViPoJmHBkaDXQpeYHAxzTbSB~f4buY5LC3-NOI31ZReC8fZdfWhXwxhj4fOz9twBFSfEtQpn2lWbfQwT0mS1uoKoVZgB1EoV77cp1AffVhCSXK0Pv9W1J~AHwpNze6H~888-nTHRT9syCwzkssVPwcsLGSexzi~T5h0EfQOGK8F6bTER~pfZ~FvX8PIzI3jbU5YpsBBO2yK0VHW2RGKWMYTXjkCgXhWqj5dypsWNOHqJQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","During public comment at the Huntington Township Planning Commission April meeting, planning commission member Marlon Enser asked whether televisions from Bermudian Springs School District could be left at the township's electronics recycling event. The request prompted a resident to question whether Enser had district authorization and whether accepting school district equipment at the township event would breach existing waste‑hauling contracts.

Enser identified himself as \"facilities maintenance\" and wastewater/drinking‑water systems operator for Bermudian Springs School District. He said the district pays to recycle electronic devices and that a township take‑back could save taxpayer money. A resident (name given in transcript as a public commenter) said Enser made the request without district authorization, warned that Huntington Township and the school district have separate contracts with Waste Management, and said commingling devices could breach contractual provisions.

The resident said they had contacted the district business manager (referred to as Mr. Priak in the discussion) and had a copy of the school district's contract. The resident urged that planning commission members not use their appointment to the commission in a manner that could appear to favor the school district or to risk breaching contracts. Enser replied that there was no ill intent and that his inquiry was meant to save taxpayers money.

The commission did not take formal action on the matter during the meeting and noted the question raised in public comment, saying any change that would involve school‑district property would require proper authorization from the district and review of contract terms.","During public comment a planning commission member's suggestion that school district televisions be brought to a township electronics recycling event prompted a resident to question whether the action could breach existing Waste Management contracts and whether the commission member had authorization from the school district.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6560279,"LCDM seeks occupancy change and 50x50 office addition at White Church Road site",120,736000,856000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3459511-f5da2bdbdb43b5d906b6942ec399cb1d&start=736&end=856","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3459511-f5da2bdbdb43b5d906b6942ec399cb1d/thumbnail_736000.jpg","/articles/6560279/Pennsylvania/LCDM-seeks-occupancy-change-and-50x50-office-addition-at-White-Church-Road-site","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6560279-e8da0ea303e288e03423b79629427038/orig.mp4?Expires=1770889564&Signature=akF4SU~r7t~5USr5gNy-puKRCmsz8oF1u~i3nozO-YRs3W6yFhxhLmHNzoK47~7FvlKDeQrDlRPWrkVlpH8J7jeS9GJvefYwQ7WTQ9vrKT7oOrPyMQAV3SgCrmOOYp6g94BLDvctxTFZfS4jxqUk6KWvqwbmi67o~fACYeQOSPAqdtfFUIGuOqm571h-IuL61T3gE4WqGrUy2Jib21UHapzgH70McwMISg2iTpoySjSSBdErStwQNgEIjw6ZM9VPAZ~7KtZkJm6pOyLFvUEuihEmuAP5pPcr2XkC20T0J7deD6fx5-9viiaRdZFV-ceZ~TYxvHRTU7YVbcQevdSFZw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The commission heard a report that LCDM has submitted a building‑permit application for an office addition at 255 White Church Road and has applied for a change of occupancy for an existing storage building the company now intends to use for manufacturing.

Zoning officer Gus summarized the submission: LCDM's application proposes a 50‑by‑50 office addition to an existing building, and the firm is seeking an occupancy permit reflecting the proposed use. Gus told the commission the building has septic and water for restrooms but that township building permit issuance depends on the inspector confirming the building meets occupancy and code requirements.

Gus said the firm had a storage occupancy previously and must secure an occupancy permit for the proposed manufacturing use before a building permit for the new office will be issued. Gus also noted a future building footprint for an additional structure is shown on the applicant's plans but would be a later phase.

Staff said the application materials and an illustration of the proposed office are in the planning packet and that the item remains under review by the inspection agency and township staff.","Township staff reported LCDM has applied for a building permit and an occupancy permit change for 255 White Church Road to convert an existing storage building to manufacturing and to add a 50‑by‑50 office; staff said building permit issuance awaits inspector signoff on occupancy and code compliance.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6560284,"Conservation district inspection prompts follow‑up; permit reissued through 2029",0,1932000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3459511-f5da2bdbdb43b5d906b6942ec399cb1d&start=1932&end=1932","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3459511-f5da2bdbdb43b5d906b6942ec399cb1d/thumbnail_1932000.jpg","/articles/6560284/Pennsylvania/Conservation-district-inspection-prompts-followup-permit-reissued-through-2029","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6560284-e7bd9a829900b1591ecd417b1b71d4ac/orig.mp4?Expires=1770889564&Signature=MeH21Q68PZNj-Py~U91WN~6uVg2d-9fzdY8nCoSWCkgj114Yu0DIZ8LYodk47chnfLIau5aZGb44T7ZS0ci9ccr2aN~WPRhN0Tw~JGhxPqAhawQbhYLYzlcrMXXk2c5n7YCTEdX4YCDv0FFkIGpmnXX7nmXt2DayhDE6RECDh7Hpaxu-pl~8b1t099csq0ZCjiGrDCID49CIBK0sidfubOvV7ouKvrirfmQ1TDKsjyCgrALLEXwX3nD8tdsvorTjMiBmmW9MYsRbM6Z5Rxqz0erCBxqL74UI-9opp~jEpchpD6urZEMCI-2Yeh9x0EalBJsuWlY-MQivOAR7Zb0JSA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Township staff and the planning commission reviewed an inspection report and conservation‑district follow‑up related to a separate property discussed during the EB Clearing agenda item. The report documents deficiencies in post‑construction stormwater and erosion controls and directs the property owner to complete a previously approved plan.

Township engineer Scott and zoning officer Gus said the conservation district had approved a plan several years earlier but that final implementation steps were not completed. The conservation district has informed the owner that the plan must be finished; staff said the district would perform a follow‑up inspection. The packet indicates the permit was reissued in February 2025 and extended through 2029.

Commissioners characterized the packet materials as informational and said enforcement and follow‑up inspections would be handled by the conservation district and county. The township asked to be kept apprised because complaints about the site had been made by township residents.

Scott told the commission the conservation district typically performs periodic inspections and that when a landowner seeks to close a permit, a final inspection is required; in this case the district found outstanding work and instructed the owner to complete specified measures. Conservation‑district enforcement, including potential further action if the owner does not complete corrective work, was described as the next step.","A county inspection report and Soil Conservation District follow‑up on a separate site prompted discussion; the conservation district is requiring the property owner to finish an older erosion‑control plan and has set a follow‑up inspection with a permit reissued in February 2025 and extended through 2029.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":103,"_43":114,"_45":114,"_47":115,"_49":116,"_51":117,"_53":118,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":119,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":120,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6560288,"Planning commission tables EB Clearing land‑development plan for Old Harrisburg Road",1655000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3459511-f5da2bdbdb43b5d906b6942ec399cb1d&start=1655&end=1655","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3459511-f5da2bdbdb43b5d906b6942ec399cb1d/thumbnail_1655000.jpg","/articles/6560288/Pennsylvania/Planning-commission-tables-EB-Clearing-landdevelopment-plan-for-Old-Harrisburg-Road","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6560288-9fe9e355e8cb98b83aaa17f8c739917b/orig.mp4?Expires=1770889564&Signature=Ed1RB6qcxWql6rymNOcxHrdc5Tju-LwJtKiOBO0ADnhsMJuLEoAi1P8oIALnDv6Iv9mUhc3WQADdKvZMp7EA4SZujOdY-3-4fOGFoEFdlhtbwu7Z9EXCfITzMGv-jjd-aIZmmS8PPlDtPQJPiVwOTCdYYX6LNUHuRmUrxqhUG6D8aOEPtdNulHYGCPZM~3x8QWwxmZIEOfogYKz4JLihpDstT4hUvHP50IqzGap6ipj~3tZGPKo6vwAajcQ8xl39MfLV~YjKi2N8tvt6npIpTFv~vzdIDiAlSvZzH~Pu-ouUXXXBxO86zdzsGlukXipkawshTulZ18xgrF5vWDsVXw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Huntington Township Planning Commission on its April meeting considered the preliminary/final land‑development plan submitted by EB Clearing for a property on Old Harrisburg Road and voted to table the application while county and conservation‑district comments are addressed.

Commissioners said the submission arrived with review comments from county staff and the Soil Conservation District and that the applicant must respond before the commission can act. Township engineer Scott (last name not provided) told the commission the county had issued an \"incomplete\" or compliance notice on technical items rather than a denial and that the county and conservation‑district comments included concerns such as infiltration and other site‑specific items that the engineer expects the applicant to revise.

The plan covers a parcel on Old Harrisburg Road identified in the submission as parcel number 6076745 (as read aloud in the meeting). Commission zoning officer Gus summarized materials in the packet and told the commission the submission before them was the first formal presentation of this land‑development plan.

Commissioners asked for clarification about which comments applied to the land‑development submission and which referred to a separate site that had an inspection report. Staff clarified that some inspection materials in the packet related to a separate property and would be set aside for that case; the county and conservation‑district comments in the packet did apply to EB Clearing's new parcel.

After discussion, the commission voted to table the preliminary/final land‑development plan for EB Clearing to allow review of the county and conservation‑district comments and to give the applicant time to respond.

The commission chair set the matter for further review at the next meeting and asked staff to circulate the county and conservation‑district comment letters to commissioners before that meeting.","The Huntington Township Planning Commission reviewed county and conservation‑district comments on the preliminary/final land‑development plan for EB Clearing at 6745 Old Harrisburg Road and voted to table action to allow review and responses to outstanding comments.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Huntington Township Planning Commission (April meeting)

Public commenter raises concern about school district TVs at township electronics recycling event

LCDM seeks occupancy change and 50x50 office addition at White Church Road site

Conservation district inspection prompts follow‑up; permit reissued through 2029

Planning commission tables EB Clearing land‑development plan for Old Harrisburg Road