Southlake City Council faces opposition over proposed zoning deviations for Liberty Commons

The Southlake City Council convened on May 20, 2025, to discuss several key agenda items, with a significant focus on a proposed development project that has raised concerns among residents and council members alike.

The meeting began with a review of the proposed zoning changes for a site currently designated as SP1 and O1. The future land use plan indicates the area should be classified as C3, C2, SP1, and O1. However, the developer's proposal suggests a deviation towards a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) designation, which has sparked criticism for not aligning with the city’s established land use designations. Council members expressed concerns about the potential removal of protected trees, as highlighted by Keith Martin, the landscape administrator.

One of the contentious points raised was regarding Lot 5 of the commercial proposal, which falls under the C1 zoning district. This district permits sit-down restaurants but prohibits take-out and drive-thru services. The proposed plan includes a drive-thru, which council members argued contradicts existing ordinances and should not be permitted.

Hillary Raveler, a resident opposing the proposal, emphasized the importance of adhering to the city’s future land use plan and tree ordinances, which have contributed to Southlake's recognition as a Tree City USA for 25 years. She highlighted concerns about exceptions being made in the residential portion of the proposal, including reduced setbacks and increased lot coverage, which she believes undermine the quality standards that Southlake is known for.

Raveler also noted that many neighbors are opposed to the proposal and expressed a desire for more community engagement, suggesting that a spin meeting would have been beneficial to discuss the project further.

As the meeting progressed, council members were urged to consider these concerns seriously before making any decisions regarding the proposal. The discussions underscored the ongoing tension between development interests and community standards in Southlake, reflecting a broader dialogue about growth and preservation in the area. The council is expected to deliberate on these issues further in upcoming sessions, with residents keenly watching the outcomes.