State worker unions oppose $767M payroll cuts in California budget revision

In a recent meeting of the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 5, significant concerns were raised regarding proposed budget cuts that could severely impact California's state workers and essential services. The meeting, held on May 20, 2025, featured testimonies from various state employees and union representatives who voiced their opposition to a proposed $767 million reduction in state payroll.

Karina Grove, a state worker and union recording secretary, emphasized the critical role state employees play in maintaining clean water and air, as well as preventing catastrophic wildfires. She argued that balancing the budget on the backs of state workers is unacceptable, particularly after they have fought for and ratified their contracts. David Jimenez, vice president of a local union, echoed this sentiment, highlighting that state workers have consistently stepped up during crises, including wildfires and the COVID-19 pandemic.

The proposed cuts also include the elimination of nearly 300 vacant state scientist positions, which could hinder California's ability to meet its climate and health goals. Hannah Johnson, a state scientist, warned that these reductions would be detrimental to already understaffed programs responsible for protecting public health and the environment.

In addition to payroll cuts, the meeting addressed a controversial proposal to withdraw $400 million from the Labor and Workforce Development Fund. Multiple speakers, including community organizers and representatives from various labor organizations, urged the committee to reject this proposal. They argued that the funding is essential for programs that educate workers about their rights and help combat wage theft and unsafe working conditions.

The testimonies highlighted the broader implications of these budget proposals, suggesting that cuts to state worker payroll and essential programs could undermine California's workforce and public services. As the committee considers these proposals, the voices of state workers and community advocates underscore the need for a balanced approach that does not sacrifice worker rights or essential services in the name of budgetary constraints.

The meeting concluded with a call for the committee to prioritize funding for essential services and reject cuts that would disproportionately affect vulnerable workers. As discussions continue, the outcomes of these budget proposals will be closely watched, with significant implications for California's workforce and the quality of public services.