[{"_1":2,"_112":-5,"_113":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6535347,"mediaKeyId","3408346-3886c9eafb7c12ec11a2ce280e4bc39d","parentId",3408346,"title","Votes at a glance: key measures the Assembly passed May 14, 2025","audioSeconds",13490,"startMs",2170000,"endMs",15660000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3408346-3886c9eafb7c12ec11a2ce280e4bc39d&start=2170&end=15660","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3408346-3886c9eafb7c12ec11a2ce280e4bc39d/thumbnail_2170000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6535347/California/Votes-at-a-glance-key-measures-the-Assembly-passed-May-14-2025","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6535347-9b1b773a090407a85c78bc1741305834/orig.mp4?Expires=1770704204&Signature=k5YMcUrW3UPv-KnRv8dxt5SeDgZnJvVU7zI0hrOoHgLaCF6sgIxSXBRy9i9D4JNRUOvOm9iz3F82sukFYcXbLMziMI7ThHN3zxL7rSOO3YC7TjdhZ7up7lCwaIs5PGT5S~A2vrikAEf1pxNrIe1tjVcLELaXPS2V7vGZwZDrz9kGAv9F5L5iem0H4Fv~77ouXjt5H7C9MJygGjXwiZ7bQaWNLOxg8N3Dhpsn9kJkUQsGhbszAe1AHj6Dsm2xJG~Hd~-jOs9XxrthnNj6KN5RTL2kv0BKOraror9yz~QtRK~Sk3Kvu507bRZzRBx0K0iSfZuGyBBi7vfYIDUq9vQn5g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","California State Assembly","date","2025-05-19T00:00:00Z","article","SACRAMENTO — The California Assembly considered a long daily file on May 14 and recorded votes on numerous bills and resolutions. Below are selected measures that received floor action that day; items are brief summaries followed by the recorded floor tally where provided in the official roll call.

- AB 578 (Bauer‑Kahan) — Consumer protections for food delivery platforms requiring refunds for undelivered goods; passed on third reading. Vote: Ayes 47, Noes 2.

- AB 344 (Valencia) — Updates the definition of successor beer manufacturer to reflect present‑day businesses; passed. Vote: Ayes 61, Noes 0.

- AB 454 (Kalra) — Removes the sunset date from the California Migratory Bird Protection Act, making state protections permanent; the bill carried an urgency clause and passed. Vote: Ayes 55, Noes 12.

- AB 1237 (McKenner) — Authorizes LA Metro and Santa Clara VTA to charge a $5 fee on primary game tickets for 2026 FIFA World Cup matches to provide a game‑day transit pass; passed with urgency threshold. Vote (urgency): Ayes 56, Noes 15.

- AB 761 (Addis) — District bill enabling Monterey‑Salinas Transit (MST) to place a sales tax measure before voters to sustain transit services; passed. Vote: Ayes 47, Noes 12.

- AB 1460 (Rogers) — Limits discriminatory contract‑pharmacy restrictions to protect clinic access to federal 340B drug discounts (narrowed to clinics and federally qualified health centers); passed. Vote recorded in committee and on floor: Ayes 41, Noes 5 (floor tally recorded as such).

- AJR 11 (Ransom) — Urged restoration of FEMA Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) funding after cancellation of previously approved projects; passed. Vote: Ayes 65, Noes 0.

- AB 260 (Majority Leader) — Protections to safeguard access to medication abortion (mifepristone), expand telehealth access and provide protections for providers and pharmacies; passed. Vote: Ayes 57, Noes 10.

- AB 290 (Bauer‑Kahan) — Consumer‑facing change to the FAIR Plan allowing autopay for homeowners on the FAIR plan to reduce coverage lapses; passed. Vote: Ayes 70, Noes 0.

- AB 904 (Majority Leader) — Clarifies childcare subsidy eligibility to reduce interruptions for parents on leave or searching for work; passed. Vote: Ayes 54, Noes 4.

- AB 920 (Kolozah) — Requires centralized permitting portals for jurisdictions over 50,000 to streamline housing approvals; passed. Vote: Ayes 66, Noes 0.

This list is not exhaustive: the Assembly took up dozens of measures (many passed on consent or by voice vote), including ceremonial resolutions recognizing tourism month, nonprofit day, Harvey Milk Day, and other proclamations. Some bills passed with urgency clauses requiring larger vote thresholds; those are noted above.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Assembly Floor Session","oneSentenceSummary","A roundup of bills and resolutions acted on by the Assembly during the May 14 floor session, with brief descriptions and final roll call tallies where recorded.","taxTitle","California State Assembly, House, Legislative, California","taxId",17099,"location","California","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6535352,"Assembly approves measure to speed infill housing by limiting CEQA challenges",1462,13674000,15136000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3408346-3886c9eafb7c12ec11a2ce280e4bc39d&start=13674&end=15136","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3408346-3886c9eafb7c12ec11a2ce280e4bc39d/thumbnail_13674000.jpg","/articles/6535352/California/Assembly-approves-measure-to-speed-infill-housing-by-limiting-CEQA-challenges","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6535352-47905449b2d92ae39dc27f6ef7d28a52/orig.mp4?Expires=1770704204&Signature=XjLuHeD~XHVUOnj6YRWlJJrwSap9eGpHLrmFyj2s5hDOGobO4ydvpdoV0r5KG21zUFsTzvBo21lNtRxOh2utfVenwZ0KeDK47WhViQaxkHPEr5vxls0fPAV8vxCTf6FcBNTnPC~WplcamBZW30YF41mpjt93lb1iGtcHn1fwQ1tmVApIPeTGDL9IPiZGP9gpLYTVcjurvvEmKkrb0H4eti9dmYKH7Xn1SioOFN~gVTFbZK8eweWtSoUIg7zFpCuJWxabpgRX0vYAaPPNB-EjQBlv~lkSqSmBGvZryOO~YDSflhwG3OMhTVONg0Kyq5OOm0bgJc7~GHfhNFy7~drdDQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","SACRAMENTO — The California Assembly on May 14 passed AB 609, a broad package measure authored by Assemblymember Wicks that seeks to limit California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) litigation for qualifying infill housing developments and streamline approvals for projects that meet local zoning and environmental standards.

Wicks described the measure as part of a “fast‑track housing package” and argued CEQA has become “redundant” and “weaponized” to delay housing projects. The author said the bill preserves local tools such as zoning and inclusionary requirements but shortens opportunities for project‑level CEQA suits when projects comply with existing plans and standards. The Assembly approved the measure on a 63–0 vote.

Supporters argued the state faces a severe housing shortage and that infill development near transit reduces vehicle miles traveled and advances climate goals. Assemblymember Harbiti, a coauthor and freshman legislator, said, “California is in a generational housing crisis… we need to be ready to fight for years until we get it right.” Assemblymember Haney emphasized local examples where infill projects near transit were blocked: “There was a project on a valet parking lot… 500 units, 25% affordable… and it was stopped on CEQA grounds,” he recounted.

Opponents cautioned that CEQA helps protect environmental quality and that reforms must preserve safeguards. Some members advocated for additional labor protections and affordable‑housing requirements to be added in subsequent negotiations; Assemblymember Ortega said he supported the bill but asked the author to continue conversations on labor and on bringing vacant affordable units online.

Wicks acknowledged the concerns and said cities retain discretion over zoning, height limits and inclusionary rules; the bill is intended to speed projects that are already consistent with local planning. During debate, proponents cited multiple statistics discussed in committee and on the floor, including that California is “2.5 million homes shy” of needs; the bill author framed the measure as an effort to reduce vehicle commute times and housing costs by increasing infill supply.

The clerk recorded the vote as Ayes 63, Noes 0. AB 609 will advance to the Senate for consideration and, if enacted, would change permitting timelines and the availability of CEQA remedies for qualifying infill projects.","The Assembly passed AB 609, a measure aimed at speeding up infill housing by narrowing opportunities for CEQA litigation on qualifying projects, while lawmakers debated balancing environmental protections, local control and housing supply.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6535357,"Assembly reaffirms birthright citizenship, urges courts to block federal order",5014,8585000,13599000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3408346-3886c9eafb7c12ec11a2ce280e4bc39d&start=8585&end=13599","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3408346-3886c9eafb7c12ec11a2ce280e4bc39d/thumbnail_8585000.jpg","/articles/6535357/California/Assembly-reaffirms-birthright-citizenship-urges-courts-to-block-federal-order","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6535357-7cdd0d65ccba7926cd70b57c617c5234/orig.mp4?Expires=1770704204&Signature=h1~Yqi6aidl3B06bP~uIWyGeOG6JNItB~4zA9jfLP6o~jv9njiIgyP~v4NjsOP~e3ygj01vYIrBpbjJidJzGYPFzWtCenuWdHZimB~2m5tVXrJ-FUmeKbRhSuz4TkqGSNCzRsRHAAVtX3d55uCaJ~deqn8XxiP8q0q72e8hxSEQv3GfI8dRmjm7UDkCbXGau40XpDEUKfNqK8yx~wNikCrOvXhvowbX4wAgHucKw~RRYp6SF1kWQgUMIdVfVahn68mSEXii865p9jjMibWCvhB9qM8dN52LGvmC4UIrI3N6arSa1nW9IZ1xTlLUHF2Ne81gyv7ZLiTty3vfFJYRIiw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","SACRAMENTO — The California Assembly on May 14 adopted Assembly Joint Resolution 5, reaffirming birthright citizenship and urging protection of the Fourteenth Amendment after the White House issued an executive order seeking to limit birthright citizenship.

Assemblymember Lee, the author, framed the resolution as a defense of constitutional precedent and the 1898 U.S. Supreme Court decision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark. Lee said the executive order “is so blatantly unconstitutional” and warned the order could create “millions of stateless children” if upheld. The Assembly adopted the resolution 58–1.

Support for the resolution crossed caucus lines during floor debate. Assemblymember Kalra (coauthor) discussed the historical legal basis, noting Wong Kim Ark’s case affirmed the citizenship of U.S.‑born children of non‑citizen parents. Assemblymember Haney, noting that Wong Kim Ark was born in San Francisco, described the case’s local significance and called the order an attempt to “divide us” and “devalue the American identity of entire communities.”

Speakers repeatedly tied the debate to civil‑rights and immigrant‑rights concerns. Assemblymember Carrillo, vice chair of the Latino Caucus, called the executive order “reckless and unconstitutional,” saying “to question the citizenship of their U.S.‑born children is an insult to their sacrifices and to our nation's principles.” The Asian American and Pacific Islander Caucus, the LGBTQ caucus, the Black Caucus and the Jewish Caucus each registered support on the floor.

Opposition voiced procedural caution and deference to the courts. Assemblymember DeBau (DeMayo) said he would await the Supreme Court's considered judgment and emphasized the legal complexity of the 1898 precedent, while others suggested the issue should be resolved judicially rather than legislatively.

After debate the Assembly opened the roll for coauthors (55 were added) and then voted on the resolution itself. The clerk recorded the final tally as Ayes 58, Noes 1; the resolution was adopted.

The resolution is a formal state legislative statement opposing the federal executive order and citing constitutional and historical precedent, including the Wong Kim Ark decision. It urges federal leadership and the courts to uphold birthright citizenship.","The Assembly adopted a joint resolution opposing a presidential executive order that would end birthright citizenship, citing historical Supreme Court precedent and widespread legislative support across caucuses.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6535363,"Assembly urges federal leaders to protect Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid",1915,4684000,6599000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3408346-3886c9eafb7c12ec11a2ce280e4bc39d&start=4684&end=6599","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3408346-3886c9eafb7c12ec11a2ce280e4bc39d/thumbnail_4684000.jpg","/articles/6535363/California/Assembly-urges-federal-leaders-to-protect-Social-Security-Medicare-and-Medicaid","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6535363-4ee711524cd3321f0c8d3495d19824e8/orig.mp4?Expires=1770704204&Signature=oyzHMyOywVnVTezsTGhU323B2XhtmuHMTzMSqFSJZalxSjvppTgh5vmD6liy1VT95X0i14c5bLNshTwyJd6JL-99Xkxy1DZIL0OOUnpl69dVfHyrHKsdK15bHL~8DW6tZdGvkiGo77sgGt2RZGzF9Vtsnk3aOsT~~hH10haTaMpRPIicmV2H9YrwMdpESZVf-Z7FvuQPusAHWkCT5rRn2N0CrUy572cwITflYhJJguJIGM1bf1TZOjhyS1K3nI-pQUd9p4Ne-VhWYZezhW5Zs3IODThkBc6dT4UUsqGIvgR2WJ70mr2SLHuMX-HzMQOZQ6GftprxyxZBoUj9FgQwsQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","SACRAMENTO — The California State Assembly on May 14 adopted Assembly Joint Resolution 3, asking federal leaders to preserve Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid and warning that proposed federal cuts would harm seniors, children, people with disabilities and families.

The resolution, introduced by Assemblymember Schiavo, says current federal proposals could ‘‘change how care is delivered under Medicare, resulting in the reduction of care and increasing costs’’ and urges California’s congressional delegation to oppose cuts. The chamber passed the resolution 53–2.

The measure was filed as a message to federal leaders and framed as a defense of programs that serve roughly millions of Californians. Schiavo told members, “Social Security is our nation's most important source of retirement income, disability, and life insurance,” and said cuts would “create irreparable harm to seniors, children, the disabled, and families.” She also highlighted Medi‑Cal enrollment figures, saying nearly 15 million Californians rely on the program.

Lawmakers debated two overlapping themes: the immediate federal threat that supporters said would reduce access to care, and criticism from some members that state policy and budgeting — not only federal action — contributed to Medi‑Cal’s current challenges. Assemblymember Tangipa argued the Assembly should also address state actions: “If we're truly concerned about Medi‑Cal, we forgot who to actually address this to. We really need to start by writing this letter to Governor Newsom,” she said, citing proposals in the May revise that she said would reduce reimbursement rates and noting delays in drawing down federal matching funds.

Assemblymember DeMaio, who opposed the resolution, accused state leaders of responsibility for funding problems and criticized the majority for not addressing state choices first: “You have a Medicaid program in our state. It's called Medi‑Cal. And right now, what have you done under your management? You've put it on the brink of financial collapse,” he said, and said the Legislature rejected an amendment he supported.

Supporters stressed the resolution's federal focus. Assemblymember Schultz told colleagues, “If you believe that Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid are critical lifelines… vote ‘Aye,’” while Assemblymember Lee called the federal proposals “a chainsaw to the economy, all fueled by their billionaire friends.” Several members pointed to particular hospitals and rural communities that would be disproportionately affected if federal Medicaid funding were reduced.

The Assembly opened the roll for coauthors and added 52 coauthors before the final vote. The clerk recorded the vote as Ayes 53, Noes 2; the resolution was adopted.

The resolution is nonbinding; it directs the state Legislature’s position and asks federal officials to preserve the programs. Members on both sides urged continued attention to Medi‑Cal’s financing at the state level even as they urged federal protections.","The California Assembly adopted a resolution urging Congress and the president to oppose proposed cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid (Medi-Cal), with members debating both federal threats and state-level preparedness.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: key measures the Assembly passed May 14, 2025

Assembly approves measure to speed infill housing by limiting CEQA challenges

Assembly reaffirms birthright citizenship, urges courts to block federal order

Assembly urges federal leaders to protect Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid