The Conference Committee on HF2431 convened on May 17, 2025, to discuss key amendments and positions regarding educational policies in Minnesota. The meeting began with a call for further member discussion before transitioning to public testimony, which ultimately did not occur due to a lack of attendees.

Senator Fonte expressed gratitude towards Senator Duckworth for his collaborative efforts in bridging the gap between the Senate and House positions. He highlighted a significant amendment, referred to as the "19 man amendment," which would allow school districts the option to opt out of certain requirements. This change aims to facilitate progress on the bill.

The discussion then shifted to the misconduct policy, where Senator Fonte noted that the Senate's stance is increasingly aligning with the House's position. However, he acknowledged that further internal discussions are necessary among Senate colleagues who hold strong opinions on the matter.

Senator Duckworth raised a question regarding the financial implications of the proposed amendments, specifically concerning direct admissions for public and charter high schools. He requested clarification on whether the amendment would affect the associated costs, which currently include a proposed increase of $500,000 per biennium for direct admissions. Miss Burrows responded that the impact of allowing schools to opt out on the cost estimates remains uncertain and would require further analysis with the Office of Higher Education.

As the meeting progressed, Co-Chair Rearick inquired about the persistent inclusion of the summer academic enrichment program, which had faced cuts from the governor. Senator Fatae explained that the program, originally proposed by Senator Dzic, has garnered significant support among committee members, leading to its continued presence in discussions.

The meeting concluded without public testimony, and members were invited to make closing remarks. The committee's ongoing efforts to reconcile differences between the Senate and House positions on educational policies remain a focal point as they move forward.