In a pivotal session held on May 14, 2025, the New York Legislature engaged in a heated discussion surrounding the proposed Safer Weapons, Safer Home Act, which aims to explore the viability of personalized handguns. The bill, championed by Mr. Borres, mandates the Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) to investigate these firearms within 180 days and, if deemed viable, to establish testing criteria and maintain a list of approved models.

As the debate unfolded, legislators expressed a mix of support and skepticism. Proponents highlighted the potential of personalized handguns to reduce accidental shootings, particularly among children, by ensuring that only authorized users can fire the weapon. Mr. Borres emphasized that the bill does not mandate the use of these firearms, nor does it repeal existing safe storage laws, but rather seeks to enhance safety measures.

Critics, however, raised concerns about the reliability of the technology. They questioned whether the proposed smart guns could truly prevent accidents and deter gun trafficking, arguing that the technology might not be mature enough to warrant such regulatory measures. Some legislators voiced fears that reliance on technology could lead to complacency among gun owners, potentially increasing risks rather than mitigating them.

The discussion also touched on the financial implications of personalized handguns, with costs ranging from $800 to $2,500, significantly higher than conventional firearms. This raised alarms about accessibility for average consumers and the potential for creating an unintended barrier to responsible gun ownership.

As the session progressed, the conversation shifted to the role of DCJS in certifying the technology. While some legislators questioned the agency's expertise, others pointed out that the bill allows for flexibility in defining what constitutes a personalized handgun, ensuring that regulations can adapt as technology evolves.

Ultimately, the session underscored the complexities surrounding gun legislation in New York, balancing the desire for innovation in firearm safety with the need for thorough scrutiny of new technologies. As the legislature moves forward, the outcome of this bill could set a significant precedent for how personalized firearms are regulated in the state, reflecting broader national conversations about gun safety and ownership rights.