Board of Supervisors scrutinizes Joanna Francisca's qualifications for Registrar of Voters

In a recent Shasta County Board of Supervisors meeting held on April 22, 2025, significant concerns were raised regarding the qualifications and actions of Joanna Francisca, the current Registrar of Voters (ROV). The discussions highlighted allegations of misconduct, lack of transparency, and the potential implications for the integrity of the electoral process in the county.

The meeting featured public comments from several residents, including accusations against Francisca for misleading the board and mishandling election-related documents. Critics pointed to a specific incident where Francisca allegedly accepted $1.5 million from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) without proper board approval, raising questions about her adherence to legal and ethical standards. This lack of transparency, according to speakers, undermines public confidence in elections and violates Sunshine Laws that guarantee public access to government records.

Dolores Lucero, one of the speakers, also announced a federal lawsuit against a local media outlet for defamation, claiming that false reports about her involvement in election fraud have harmed her reputation and career. This incident underscores the contentious atmosphere surrounding election-related discussions in the county.

Deidre Holiday emphasized the importance of selecting a trustworthy and capable leader for the ROV position, arguing that experience alone should not overshadow ethical considerations. She urged the board to scrutinize Francisca's past actions, suggesting that any illegal behavior should disqualify her from the role. The call for accountability was echoed by other speakers who expressed concerns about the potential appointment of a candidate with "fringe views" on election integrity.

Benjamin Noane, another public commenter, criticized the board's decision-making process, suggesting that it lacked transparency and appeared predetermined. He argued that the board should prioritize qualified internal candidates like Francisca, warning that failing to do so could further erode public trust in the electoral system.

The meeting concluded with calls for the board to reconsider its stance on various petitions related to election integrity, with some members questioning the rationale behind opposing requests that align with state law. The discussions reflect a broader concern within the community about the future of elections in Shasta County and the need for leadership that prioritizes honesty and accountability.

As the board prepares to make a decision on the next ROV, the implications of their choice will likely resonate throughout the community, impacting public trust and the overall integrity of the electoral process. The upcoming appointment is seen as a critical juncture for Shasta County, with residents urging the board to act in the best interest of transparency and democratic values.